Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27928736›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2017

Antiplatelet agents in hemodialysis.

Massimiliano Migliori, Vincenzo Cantaluppi, Alessia Scatena, Vincenzo Panichi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimiliano MiglioriNephrology and Dialysis, Azienda USL Nord Ovest Toscana, Versilia Hospital, Versilia, Italy. maxmigliori@yahoo.it.
Vincenzo CantaluppiNephrology and Kidney Transplant Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Alessia ScatenaNephrology and Dialysis, Azienda USL Nord Ovest Toscana, Versilia Hospital, Versilia, Italy.
Vincenzo PanichiNephrology and Dialysis, Azienda USL Nord Ovest Toscana, Versilia Hospital, Versilia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-3172
Ospedale Versilia · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD) are treated with antiplatelet agents (AA) and/or anticoagulant drugs, which are fundamental in the management of stroke, coronary atherosclerotic disease, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation. CVD is the most important cause of death in chronic renal failure (CRF). Death rates from myocardial infarction (MI) and from all other cardiac causes exceed those for the general population. Incidence of MI in CRF is triple that in the general population. Moreover, mortality is seven- to eight-fold higher in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis compared to the general population, and approximately 40% of deaths in this population are attributable to coronary artery disease (CAD). For these reasons, AA are widely used in patients affected by CRF. Current data do not support a protective effect of antiplatelet administration in hemodialytic patients as primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality. Different results have been obtained concerning secondary prevention of CVD. The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project demonstrated that dialysis patients treated with aspirin following MI had a 43% lower mortality. Another study reported that the use of aspirin and beta-blockers following MI was associated with lower mortality in CRF patients. However, aspirin plus clopidogrel seems to increase the hemorrhagic risk without a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and there are insufficient data to support the use of new AA drugs in hemodialytic patients. In conclusion, since CRF patients are one of the groups at highest risk for atherosclerotic events, it could be reasonable to use aspirin in HD patients. However, the bleeding risk in HD patients needs to be strongly evaluated, especially before starting dual AA treatment.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisBlood CoagulationBlood PlateletsCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Decision-MakingHemorrhageHumansKidney DiseasesPatient SelectionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAntiplatelet drugsAspirinCardiovascular diseaseChronic renal failureHemodialysis

Identifiers

PMID27928736
OpenAlexW2560283793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.