ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Utility of double endoscopic intraluminal operation for esophageal cancer.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparable Data Between Double Endoscopic Intraluminal Operation and Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Article
- Resection of Mucosal and Submucosal Gastrointestinal Lesions and a Double Endoscope Experience.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a more difficult technique for esophageal cancer than for gastric cancer because the working space for esophageal ESD is small. Further, the difficulty level gradually increases depending on the size of the carcinoma. To overcome these difficulties, double endoscopic intraluminal operation (DEILO), which enables the resection of mucosal lesions using two fine endoscopes and monopolar shears, was reported previously. Here, we report the utility of DEILO for esophageal cancer.
methodsA total of 26 esophageal cancer patients (19 men and seven women) with 26 lesions treated using DEILO between 2011 and 2014 at Gunma University Hospital were included. We evaluated the utility and safety of DEILO for early esophageal cancer.
resultsFor all patients (100%), the DEILO procedure was performed successfully, and en bloc resection was achieved. The median operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and the longitudinal dimension of resected specimens were 123 min (range 45-236 min), 5 days, and 32 mm, respectively. Perioperative perforation, pneumothorax, and mediastinal emphysema were not recognized. Only one patient was diagnosed with a postoperative hemorrhage, but the bleeding was successfully treated by bleeding vessel coagulation.
conclusionDEILO has good utility as a technique of ESD for early esophageal cancers. Additional improvement and advancement of the procedure will increase the indication of DEILO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.