Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27928551›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis (Washington, D.C.)2016

Drug Discrimination and the Analysis of Private Events.

Brian D Kangas, David R Maguire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian D KangasMcLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
David R MaguireUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Funding

Drug Self Administration and Withdrawal Effects on Cognitive FunctionK01DA035974 · NIDA · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI KANGAS, BRIAN D. · 2013 to 2017
$743k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA035974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A defining feature of radical behaviorism is the explicit inclusion of private events as material phenomena within a science of behavior. Surprisingly, however, despite much theorizing, there is a notable paucity within behavior analysis of controlled experimentation and analysis of private events, especially in nonhuman animals. One technique that is amenable to the study of private events is drug discrimination. For over 40 years, drug discrimination procedures have been an incredibly effective tool providing a wealth of

Indexed as

behavioral pharmacologydrug discriminationprivate eventsradical behaviorism

Identifiers

PMID27928551
PMCPMC5137942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.