Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27928506›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2016

Get the most out of blow hormones: validation of sampling materials, field storage and extraction techniques for whale respiratory vapour samples.

Elizabeth A Burgess, Kathleen E Hunt, Scott D Kraus, Rosalind M Rolland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) as a tool for conservation.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026
    Review
  2. Closing the air gap: the use of drones for studying wildlife ecophysiology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is Harbor Porpoise (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A BurgessJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory , New England Aquarium , 1 Central Wharf , Boston, MA 02110, USA.
Kathleen E HuntJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory , New England Aquarium , 1 Central Wharf , Boston, MA 02110, USA.
Scott D KrausJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory , New England Aquarium , 1 Central Wharf , Boston, MA 02110, USA.
Rosalind M RollandJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory , New England Aquarium , 1 Central Wharf , Boston, MA 02110, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies are progressively showing that vital physiological data may be contained in the respiratory vapour (blow) of cetaceans. Nonetheless, fundamental methodological issues need to be addressed before hormone analysis of blow can become a reliable technique. In this study, we performed controlled experiments in a laboratory setting, using known doses of pure parent hormones, to validate several technical factors that may play a crucial role in hormone analyses. We evaluated the following factors: (i) practical field storage of samples on small boats during daylong trips; (ii) efficiency of hormone extraction methods; and (iii) assay interference of different sampler types (i.e. veil nylon, nitex nylon mesh and polystyrene dish). Sampling materials were dosed with mock blow samples of known mixed hormone concentrations (progesterone, 17β-estradiol, testosterone, cortisol, aldosterone and triiodothyronine), designed to mimic endocrine profiles characteristic of pregnant females, adult males, an adrenal glucocorticoid response or a zero-hormone control (distilled H

Indexed as

Blowcetaceanhormone analysistechnique validation

Identifiers

PMID27928506
PMCPMC5001149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.