Evaluation of Pulse Oximetry in the Early Detection of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease in Newborns.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
   Pooled it
2. Pulse oximetry in pediatric care: Balancing advantages and limitations.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2024
   Article
3. A 15-Year-Old With Tetralogy of Fallot With Pulmonic Atresia, Multiple Aorticopulmonary Collateral Arteries and Bilateral Peripheral Pulmonary Stenosis.Cureus · 2020
   Article
4. Role of pulse oximetry in detecting critical congenital heart disease among newborns delivered at a high altitude setting in Ethiopia.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as