Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27928092›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016

Animal Husbandry Practices and Perceptions of Zoonotic Infectious Disease Risks Among Livestock Keepers in a Rural Parish of Quito, Ecuador.

Christopher Lowenstein, William F Waters, Amira Roess, Jessica H Leibler, Jay P Graham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. The Threshold Effect of Swine Epidemics on the Pig Supply in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Multi-Drug ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antimicrobial Resistance in Rural Settings in Latin America: A Scoping Review with a One Health Lens.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher LowensteinDivisions of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California.
William F WatersInstitute for Research in Health and Nutrition, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Amira RoessDepartment of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jessica H LeiblerDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jay P GrahamPublic Health Institute, Oakland, California. jay.graham@phi.org.
Boston University · USGeorge Washington University · USPublic Health Institute · USUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · EC

Funding

A Study of Enteropathogenic Bacteria Transmitted from Animals to HumansK01TW009484 · FIC · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI GRAHAM, JAY PAUL · 2014 to 2017
$535k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW009484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-scale livestock production plays an essential role as a source of income and nutrition for households in low- and middle-income countries, yet these practices can also increase risk of zoonotic infectious diseases, especially among young children. To mitigate this risk, there is a need to better understand how livestock producers perceive and manage risks of disease transmission. Twenty semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with small-scale livestock producers in a semirural parish of Quito, Ecuador. Interviews explored livestock-raising practices, including animal health-care practices and use of antimicrobials, family members' interactions with livestock and other animals, and perceptions of health risk associated with these practices and activities. Interviews were analyzed for common themes. Awareness of zoonotic disease transmission was widespread, yet few study participants considered raising livestock a significant health risk for themselves or their families. Several study households reported handling and consuming meat or poultry from sick or dead animals and using animal waste as a fertilizer on their crops. Households typically diagnosed and treated their sick animals, occasionally seeking treatment advice from employees of local animal feed stores where medications, including antimicrobials, are available over the counter. Despite a basic understanding of zoonotic disease risk, this study identified several factors, such as the handling and consumption of sick and dead animals and purchasing medications for sick animals over the counter, that potentially increase the risk of zoonotic disease transmission as well as the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

LivestockRural PopulationZoonosesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsDisease Transmission, InfectiousEcuadorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27928092
PMCPMC5154466
OpenAlexW2530261266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.