ArticleNucleic acids research2017
RepeatsDB 2.0: improved annotation, classification, search and visualization of repeat protein structures.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate contact-based modelling of repeat proteins predicts the structure of new repeats protein families.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- RepeatsDB in 2021: improved data and extended classification for protein tandem repeat structures.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- The Effect of Mutations in the TPR and Ankyrin Families of Alpha Solenoid Repeat Proteins.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- The Pfam protein families database in 2019.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.