ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2017
Validating Use of Internet-Submitted Carbon Monoxide Values by Video to Determine Quit Status.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Pooled it
- Switching behavior and changes in smoking behavior by menthol cigarette preference and menthol heated tobacco product use among adults in the United States who smoke cigarettes: an actual use study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Reintroducing face-to-face support alongside remote support to form a hybrid stop smoking service in England: a formative mixed methods evaluation.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The 2022 Ferno Award Address: CrEATE, an Efficient Crossover Evaluation of Addiction Treatment Efficacy.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Article
- Mobile, Remote, and Individual Focused: Comparing Breath Carbon Monoxide Readings and Abstinence Between Smartphone-Enabled and Stand-Alone Monitors.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021Article
- Very Light Daily Smoking in Young Adults: Relationships Between Nicotine Dependence and Lapse.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021Article
- Determining Optimal Cutoffs for Exhaled Carbon Monoxide and Salivary Cotinine to Identify Smokers among Korean Americans in a Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial.Journal of smoking cessation · 2021Article
- A Procedure to Standardize Puff Topography During Evaluations of Acute Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Exposure.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020Article
- A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation smartphone application with a carbon monoxide checker.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- Lessons learned from unsuccessful use of personal carbon monoxide monitors to remotely assess abstinence in a pragmatic trial of a smartphone stop smoking app - A secondary analysis.Addictive behaviors reports · 2019Article
- A novel and remote biochemical verification method of smoking abstinence: Predictors of participant compliance.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDaily visits to biochemically verify continuous smoking abstinence via expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) may deter participation in cessation trials. One way to reduce need for daily visits while continuing to monitor abstinence success may be use of a recent procedure to verify abstinence from daily CO values via the Internet. This method requires participants submit to study staff video recordings of themselves correctly using a CO monitor. However, it has not been clearly demonstrated that those classified quit via Internet-submitted videos of CO would be reliably classified quit when assessed in lab.
methodsOur study examined agreement in quit status from Internet-submitted CO values with quit status via CO collected in later same-day lab visits. Participants (n = 23) were from a short-term cessation study who agreed to record and submit videos of offsite CO testing, in addition to attending daily lab visits. All CO values were obtained via Bedfont pico+ Smokerlyzer monitors, with CO < 8 ppm indicating quit. During two 4-day practice quit attempts, a video was submitted before daily lab visits, up to eight videos each.
resultsOf the total of 150 videos submitted, 97 videos indicated "not quit" and 53 "quit." Cohen's Kappa indicated substantial agreement in quit status between assessments, 0.70, p < .001, as 85% of the videos indicating "quit" CO were also "quit" CO in lab.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, these results are the first validation of daily Internet-submitted CO values to confirm daily quit status, supporting the utility of this approach for close monitoring of continuous abstinence. IMPLICATIONS: This study compared consistency between quit status from CO values submitted over the Internet and quit status via CO collected in later same-day lab visits. Findings indicate substantial agreement in quit status between these two methods of CO assessment. Our results validate the use of Internet-submitted CO values to verify daily quit status. This method can be used in future cessation trials as a means to biochemically validate continuous abstinence without the burden of daily lab visits or relying on self-report of recent smoking lapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.