ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2016
Microbes in the Anthropocene: spillover of agriculturally selected bacteria and their impact on natural ecosystems.
Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sources and traits of bacteria and fungi found in the near-surface atmosphere.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Nutrient-rich spatial refuges buffer against extinction and promote evolutionary rescue in evolving microbial populations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Not just crop or forest: an integrated land cover map for agricultural and natural areas.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Translating macroecological models to predict microbial establishment probability in an agricultural inoculant introduction.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2024Article
- Reciprocal Inclusion of Microbiomes and Environmental Justice Contributes Solutions to Global Environmental Health Challenges.mSystems · 2022Article
- Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers.ISME communications · 2022Article
- Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world's crane species (Ecology and evolution · 2022Review
- Response of rhizosphere microbial community of Chinese chives under different fertilization treatments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Contributions of environmental and maternal transmission to the assembly of leaf fungal endophyte communities.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Orchard Management and Landscape Context Mediate the Pear Floral Microbiome.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Agricultural land use disrupts biodiversity mediation of virus infections in wild plant populations.The New phytologist · 2021Article
- Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research.Ecology letters · 2020Review
- Use of RNA and DNA to Identify Mechanisms of Bacterial Community Homogenization.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Diverse and variable virus communities in wild plant populations revealed by metagenomic tools.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Cowpea (Agriculture, ecosystems & environment · 2018Article
- Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil microbial communities are enormously diverse, with at least millions of species and trillions of genes unknown to science or poorly described. Soil microbial communities are key components of agriculture, for example, in provisioning nitrogen and protecting crops from pathogens, providing overall ecosystem services in excess of $1000bn per year. It is important to know how humans are affecting this hidden diversity. Much is known about the negative consequences of agricultural intensification on higher organisms, but almost nothing is known about how alterations to landscapes affect microbial diversity, distributions and processes. We review what is known about spatial flows of microbes and their response to land-use change, and outline nine hypotheses to advance research of microbiomes across landscapes. We hypothesize that intensified agriculture selects for certain taxa and genes, which then 'spill over' into adjacent unmodified areas and generate a halo of genetic differentiation around agricultural fields. Consequently, the spatial configuration and management intensity of different habitats combines with the dispersal ability of individual taxa to determine the extent of spillover, which can impact the functioning of adjacent unmodified habitats. When landscapes are heterogeneous and dispersal rates are high, this will select for large genomes that allow exploitation of multiple habitats, a process that may be accelerated through horizontal gene transfer. Continued expansion of agriculture will increase genotypic similarity, making microbial community functioning increasingly variable in human-dominated landscapes, potentially also impacting the consistent provisioning of ecosystem services. While the resulting economic costs have not been calculated, it is clear that dispersal dynamics of microbes should be taken into consideration to ensure that ecosystem functioning and services are maintained in agri-ecosystem mosaics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.