Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927962›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.

Luke A Johnson, Charles C Della Santina, Xiaoqin Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Does Auditory Cortex Code Temporal Information from Acoustic and Cochlear Implant Stimulation in a Similar Way?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luke A JohnsonDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-1436
Charles C Della SantinaDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and.
Xiaoqin WangDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and xiaoqin.wang@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3999-0772
Johns Hopkins University · USXiaomi (China) · CN

Funding

The Histology CoreP30DC005211 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FUCHS, PAUL ALBERT · 2002 to 2016
$9.1M
Cortical processing of cochlear implant signalsR01DC014503 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation F31DC010321 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, LUKE AARON · 2010 to 2012
$122k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC010321NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005211NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of cochlear implants (CIs) in human populations, most users perform poorly in noisy environments and music and tonal language perception. How CI devices engage the brain at the single neuron level has remained largely unknown, in particular in the primate brain. By comparing neuronal responses with acoustic and CI stimulation in marmoset monkeys unilaterally implanted with a CI electrode array, we discovered that CI stimulation was surprisingly ineffective at activating many neurons in auditory cortex, particularly in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the CI. Further analyses revealed that the CI-nonresponsive neurons were narrowly tuned to frequency and sound level when probed with acoustic stimuli; such neurons likely play a role in perceptual behaviors requiring fine frequency and level discrimination, tasks that CI users find especially challenging. These findings suggest potential deficits in central auditory processing of CI stimulation and provide important insights into factors responsible for poor CI user performance in a wide range of perceptual tasks. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neural prosthetic device to date and has restored hearing in hundreds of thousands of deaf individuals worldwide. However, despite its huge successes, CI users still face many perceptual limitations, and the brain mechanisms involved in hearing through CI devices remain poorly understood. By directly comparing single-neuron responses to acoustic and CI stimulation in auditory cortex of awake marmoset monkeys, we discovered that neurons unresponsive to CI stimulation were sharply tuned to frequency and sound level. Our results point out a major deficit in central auditory processing of CI stimulation and provide important insights into mechanisms underlying the poor CI user performance in a wide range of perceptual tasks.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexBrain MappingCallithrixDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleMaleNeuronsPsychomotor PerformanceWakefulnessauditory cortexcochlear implantmarmoset

Identifiers

PMID27927962
PMCPMC5148231
OpenAlexW2560606133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.