ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- The auditory nerve implant-concept and device description of a novel electrical auditory prosthesis.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
- Distinct cortical encoding of acoustic and electrical cochlear stimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Development of a non-human primate model for preclinical research of a novel auditory nerve implant.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Preclinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of AAV1-hOTOF in mice and nonhuman primates.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023Article
- Article
- Flexible auditory training, psychophysics, and enrichment of common marmosets with an automated, touchscreen-based system.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Neuronal development in the cochlea of a nonhuman primate model, the common marmoset.Developmental neurobiology · 2021Article
- The common marmoset as suitable nonhuman alternative for the analysis of primate cochlear development.The FEBS journal · 2021Article
- The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
- Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020Review
- Vestibular, locomotor, and vestibulo-autonomic research: 50 years of collaboration with Bernard Cohen.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Review
- Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2019Article
- Anatomical and Surgical Evaluation of the Common Marmoset as an Animal Model in Hearing Research.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019Article
- Does Auditory Cortex Code Temporal Information from Acoustic and Cochlear Implant Stimulation in a Similar Way?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the success of cochlear implants (CIs) in human populations, most users perform poorly in noisy environments and music and tonal language perception. How CI devices engage the brain at the single neuron level has remained largely unknown, in particular in the primate brain. By comparing neuronal responses with acoustic and CI stimulation in marmoset monkeys unilaterally implanted with a CI electrode array, we discovered that CI stimulation was surprisingly ineffective at activating many neurons in auditory cortex, particularly in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the CI. Further analyses revealed that the CI-nonresponsive neurons were narrowly tuned to frequency and sound level when probed with acoustic stimuli; such neurons likely play a role in perceptual behaviors requiring fine frequency and level discrimination, tasks that CI users find especially challenging. These findings suggest potential deficits in central auditory processing of CI stimulation and provide important insights into factors responsible for poor CI user performance in a wide range of perceptual tasks. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neural prosthetic device to date and has restored hearing in hundreds of thousands of deaf individuals worldwide. However, despite its huge successes, CI users still face many perceptual limitations, and the brain mechanisms involved in hearing through CI devices remain poorly understood. By directly comparing single-neuron responses to acoustic and CI stimulation in auditory cortex of awake marmoset monkeys, we discovered that neurons unresponsive to CI stimulation were sharply tuned to frequency and sound level. Our results point out a major deficit in central auditory processing of CI stimulation and provide important insights into mechanisms underlying the poor CI user performance in a wide range of perceptual tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.