Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927866›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Expert Consensus on Metrics to Assess the Impact of Patient-Level Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in Acute-Care Settings.

Rebekah W Moehring, Deverick J Anderson, Ronda L Cochran, Lauri A Hicks, Arjun Srinivasan, Elizabeth S Dodds Ashley, Structured Taskforce of Experts Working at Reliable Standards for Stewardship (STEWARDS) Panel

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebekah W MoehringDuke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, and rebekah.moehring@duke.edu.
Deverick J AndersonDuke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, and.
Ronda L CochranDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lauri A HicksDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Arjun SrinivasanDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Elizabeth S Dodds AshleyDuke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, and.
Structured Taskforce of Experts Working at Reliable Standards for Stewardship (STEWARDS) Panel

Funding

Defining Measures of Impact for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Community HospitalsK08HS023866 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOEHRING, REBEKAH WHITE · 2015 to 2019
$739k
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in a CommuniK23AI095357 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, DEVERICK JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$644k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023866NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI095357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) positively impact patient care, but metrics to assess ASP impact are poorly defined. We used a modified Delphi approach to select relevant metrics for assessing patient-level interventions in acute-care settings for the purposes of internal program decision making. An expert panel rated 90 candidate metrics on a 9-point Likert scale for association with 4 criteria: improved antimicrobial prescribing, improved patient care, utility in targeting stewardship efforts, and feasibility in hospitals with electronic health records. Experts further refined, added, or removed metrics during structured teleconferences and re-rated the retained metrics. Six metrics were rated >6 in all criteria: 2 measures of Clostridium difficile incidence, incidence of drug-resistant pathogens, days of therapy over admissions, days of therapy over patient days, and redundant therapy events. Fourteen metrics rated >6 in all criteria except feasibility were identified as targets for future development.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Infective AgentsClostridioides difficileCommunicable DiseasesDrug PrescriptionsEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousHumansIncidencePatient AdmissionPatient CarePatient SafetyProgram EvaluationTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial stewardshipoutcome measurepatient safetyprocess measurequality metrics.

Identifiers

PMID27927866
PMCPMC5241782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.