Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927860›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Prediction of Outcome From Adult Bacterial Meningitis in a High-HIV-Seroprevalence, Resource-Poor Setting Using the Malawi Adult Meningitis Score (MAMS).

Emma C Wall, Mavuto Mukaka, Matthew Scarborough, Katherine M A Ajdukiewicz, Katharine E Cartwright, Mulinda Nyirenda, Brigitte Denis, Theresa J Allain, Brian Faragher, David G Lalloo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Osmotic therapies added to antibiotics for acute bacterial meningitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacterial meningitis in Africa.Frontiers in neurology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic Modeling of Bacterial Meningitis: The Search for More Precision.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma C WallMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mavuto MukakaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Matthew ScarboroughOxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Katherine M A AjdukiewiczUniversity of Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Katharine E CartwrightSheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Mulinda NyirendaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi.
Brigitte DenisMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Theresa J AllainDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Brian FaragherMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
David G LallooMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Robert S HeydermanMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) in adults residing in resource-poor countries is associated with mortality rates >50%. To improve outcome, interventional trials and standardized clinical algorithms are urgently required. To optimize these processes, we developed and validated an outcome prediction tool to identify ABM patients at greatest risk of death. Methods: We derived a nomogram using mortality predictors derived from a logistic regression model of a discovery database of adult Malawian patients with ABM (n = 523 [65%] cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] culture positive). We validated the nomogram internally using a bootstrap procedure and subsequently used the nomogram scores to further interpret the effects of adjunctive dexamethasone and glycerol using clinical trial data from Malawi. Results: ABM mortality at 6-week follow-up was 54%. Five of 15 variables tested were strongly associated with poor outcome (CSF culture positivity, CSF white blood cell count, hemoglobin, Glasgow Coma Scale, and pulse rate), and were used in the derivation of the Malawi Adult Meningitis Score (MAMS) nomogram. The C-index (area under the curve) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, .71-.80) and calibration was good (Hosmer-Lemeshow C-statistic = 5.48, df = 8, P = .705). Harmful effects of adjunctive glycerol were observed in groups with relatively low predicted risk of poor outcome (25%-50% risk): Case Fatality Rate of 21% in the placebo group and 52% in the glycerol group (P < .001). This effect was not seen with adjunctive dexamethasone. Conclusions: MAMS provides a novel tool for predicting prognosis and improving interpretation of ABM clinical trials by risk stratification in resource-poor settings. Whether MAMS can be applied to non-HIV-endemic countries requires further evaluation.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultClinical Trials as TopicDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMaleMeningitis, BacterialNomogramsPrognosisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAfricabacterial meningitisHIVoutcomeseverity score

Identifiers

PMID27927860
PMCPMC5399948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.