ReviewOpen biology2016
Tumour biomarkers: homeostasis as a novel prognostic indicator.
Review in Open biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between lipids and lung cancer subtypes.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Association between tumor markers elevation and poor functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke: a longitudinal stroke center-based study.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Determination of urokinase-type plasminogen activator serum levels in healthy and oncologic cats.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2020Article
- Decreased DC-SIGNR expression in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts poor patient prognosis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Electrolyte Disorders Induced by Antineoplastic Drugs.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Metabolomic profiling of human lung tumor tissues - nucleotide metabolism as a candidate for therapeutic interventions and biomarkers.Molecular oncology · 2018Article
- Microbiota effects on cancer: from risks to therapies.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- Human salivary microRNAs in Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2018Review
- Correlation Between Raf/MEK/ERK Signaling Pathway and Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis for Patients With Breast Cancer Having Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The term 'personalized medicine' refers to a medical procedure that consists in the grouping of patients based on their predicted individual response to therapy or risk of disease. In oncologic patients, a 'tailored' therapeutic approach may potentially improve their survival and well-being by not only reducing the tumour, but also enhancing therapeutic response and minimizing the adverse effects. Diagnostic tests are often used to select appropriate and optimal therapies that rely both on patient genome and other molecular/cellular analysis. Several studies have shown that lifestyle and environmental factors can influence the epigenome and that epigenetic events may be involved in carcinogenesis. Thus, in addition to traditional biomarkers, epigenetic factors are raising considerable interest, because they could potentially be used as an excellent tool for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. In this review, we summarize the role of conventional cancer genetic biomarkers and their association with epigenomics. Furthermore, we will focus on the so-called 'homeostatic biomarkers' that result from the physiological response to cancer, emphasizing the concept that an altered 'new' homeostasis influence not only tumour environment, but also the whole organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.