Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927733›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2018

Participant and Public Involvement in Refining a Peer-Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: Project ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged).

Janet Withall, Janice L Thompson, Kenneth R Fox, Mark Davis, Selena Gray, Jolanthe de Koning, Liz Lloyd, Graham Parkhurst, Afroditi Stathi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Social Inclusion and Communality of Volunteering: A Focus Group Study of Older People's Experiences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Janet WithallDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, UK.
Janice L ThompsonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Kenneth R FoxSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Mark DavisCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
Selena GrayCentre for Transport and Society, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Jolanthe de KoningDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, UK.
Liz LloydCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
Graham ParkhurstCentre for Transport and Society, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Afroditi StathiDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, UK.
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence for the health benefits of a physically active lifestyle among older adults is strong, yet only a small proportion of older people meet physical activity recommendations. A synthesis of evidence identified "best bet" approaches, and this study sought guidance from end-user representatives and stakeholders to refine one of these, a peer-volunteering active aging intervention. Methods: Focus groups with 28 older adults and four professional volunteer managers were conducted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 older volunteers. Framework analysis was used to gauge participants' views on the ACE intervention. Results: Motives for engaging in community groups and activities were almost entirely social. Barriers to participation were lack of someone to attend with, lack of confidence, fear of exclusion or "cliquiness" in established groups, bad weather, transport issues, inaccessibility of activities, ambivalence, and older adults being "set in their ways". Motives for volunteering included "something to do," avoiding loneliness, the need to feel needed, enjoyment, and altruism. Challenges included negative events between volunteer and recipient of volunteering support, childcare commitments, and high volunteering workload. Conclusion: Peer-volunteering approaches have great potential for promotion of active aging. The systematic multistakeholder approach adopted in this study led to important refinements of the original ACE intervention. The findings provide guidance for active aging community initiatives highlighting the importance of effective recruitment strategies and of tackling major barriers including lack of motivation, confidence, and readiness to change; transport issues; security concerns and cost; activity availability; and lack of social support.

Indexed as

AgingDepressionAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansIndependent LivingMaleRisk Reduction BehaviorSocial SupportVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID27927733
PMCPMC5946893
OpenAlexW2522515281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.