Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927728›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2017

Preventability of Hospital Readmissions From Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Consumer Perspective.

J Mary Lou Jacobsen, John F Schnelle, Avantika A Saraf, Emily A Long, Eduard E Vasilevskis, Sunil Kripalani, Sandra F Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Mary Lou JacobsenCenter for Quality Aging, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
John F SchnelleCenter for Quality Aging, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Avantika A SarafCenter for Quality Aging, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Emily A LongCenter for Quality Aging, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Eduard E VasilevskisGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville.
Sunil KripalaniSection of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sandra F SimmonsCenter for Quality Aging, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Predicting Acute Brain Dysfunction in Older Patients: A Quality Improvement ToolK23AG040157 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI VASILEVSKIS, EDUARD E · 2011 to 2015
$609k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NIA NIH HHS K23 AG040157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: A structured interview was conducted with Medicare patients readmitted to a private, tertiary teaching hospital from skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to assess their perspectives of readmission preventability and their role in the readmission. Design and Methods: Data were collected at Vanderbilt University Medical Center using a 6-item interview administered at the bedside to Medicare beneficiaries with unplanned hospital readmissions from 23 SNFs within 60 days of a previous hospital discharge. Mixed analytical methods were applied, including a content analysis that evaluated factors contributing to hospital readmission as perceived by consumers. Results: Among 208 attempted interviews, 156 were completed, of which 53 (34%) respondents rated their readmission as preventable. 28.3% of the 53 consumers attributed the readmission to hospital factors, 52.8% attributed it to the SNF, and 18.9% believed both sites could have prevented the readmission. The primary driver of the readmission was a family member/caregiver in 31 cases and the patient in 24 of the 156 cases, amounting to 55 (35.3%) consumer-driven readmissions. Contributing factors included: premature hospital discharge (16.3%); poor discharge planning (16.3%); a clinical issue not resolved in the hospital (14.3%); inadequate treatment at the SNF (69.4%); improper medication management at the SNF (20.4%); and poor decision-making regarding the transfer (14.3%). Conclusions and Implications: Interviewing readmitted patients provides information relevant to reducing readmissions that may otherwise be omitted from hospital and SNF records. Consumers identified quality issues at both the hospital and SNF and perceived themselves as initiating a significant number of readmissions.

Indexed as

Patient Care ManagementAftercareAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedicarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPreventive Health ServicesQuality ImprovementSkilled Nursing FacilitiesUnited StatesCare transitionContinuum of careMedicareMixed-methodsPerson-centered carePost-acute careQuality of careRehospitalization

Identifiers

PMID27927728
PMCPMC5881659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.