Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927208›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2016

Use of a Sec signal peptide library from Bacillus subtilis for the optimization of cutinase secretion in Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Johannes Hemmerich, Peter Rohe, Britta Kleine, Sarah Jurischka, Wolfgang Wiechert, Roland Freudl, Marco Oldiges

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. SPSED: A Signal Peptide Secretion Efficiency Database.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes HemmerichInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Peter RoheInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Britta KleineInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Sarah JurischkaInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Wolfgang WiechertInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Roland FreudlInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Marco OldigesInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences-Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany. m.oldiges@fz-juelich.de.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnical bulk enzymes represent a huge market, and the extracellular production of such enzymes is favorable due to lowered cost for product recovery. Protein secretion can be achieved via general secretion (Sec) pathway. Specific sequences, signal peptides (SPs), are necessary to direct the target protein into the translocation machinery. For example, >150 Sec-specific SPs have been identified for Bacillus subtilis alone. As the best SP for a target protein of choice cannot be predicted a priori, screening of homologous SPs has been shown to be a powerful tool for different expression organisms. While SP libraries between closely related species were successfully applied to optimize recombinant protein secretion, this was not investigated for distantly related species. Therefore, in this study a Sec SP library from low-GC firmicutes B. subtilis is investigated to optimize protein secretion in high-GC actinobacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum using cutinase from Fusarium solani pisi as model protein.

resultsA homologous SP library (~150 SP) for recombinant cutinase secretion in B. subtilis was successfully transferred to C. glutamicum as alternative secretion host. Cutinase secretion in C. glutamicum was quantified using an automated micro scale cultivation system for online growth monitoring, cell separation and cutinase activity determination. Secretion phenotyping results were correlated to those from a previous study, in which the same SP library was used to optimize secretion of the same cutinase but using B. subtilis as host. Strikingly, behavior of specific SP-cutinase combinations was changed dramatically between B. subtilis and C. glutamicum. Some SPs showed comparable cutinase secretion performances in both hosts, whereas other SPs caused diametrical extracellular cutinase activities.

conclusionThe optimal production strain for a specific target protein of choice still cannot be designed in silico. Not only the best SP for a target protein has to be evaluated each time from scratch, the expression host also affects which SP is best. Thus, (heterologous) SP library screening using high-throughput methods is considered to be crucial to construct an optimal production strain for a target protein.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsCarboxylic Ester HydrolasesCorynebacterium glutamicumPeptide LibraryProtein Sorting SignalsRecombinant ProteinsBacterial ProteinsCarboxylic Ester HydrolasescutinasePeptide LibraryProtein Sorting SignalsRecombinant ProteinsCorynebacterium glutamicumIndustrial enzyme productionMicrobioreactorMini-Pilot-PlantProtein secretionSec signal peptide library

Identifiers

PMID27927208
PMCPMC5142396
OpenAlexW2559870726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.