Observational studyBMC nephrology2016
The importance of proteinuria and prior cardiovascular disease in all major clinical outcomes of atherosclerotic renovascular disease - a single-center observational study.
Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2016. The graph read 7 numbers from its abstract, feeding 6 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 6 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.79 (0.66 to 0.94) for Death. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]).
Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]).
Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]).
Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]).
Revascularization was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.83]) and ESKD (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46-0.76]).
Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]).
Revascularization was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.83]) and ESKD (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46-0.76]).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Antihypertensives×kidney outcomes
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →1 readable study in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Antihypertensives×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.
Cardiac procedures & devices×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.
Cardiac procedures & devices×kidney outcomes
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.
Statins×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →13 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Statins×kidney outcomes
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →4 readable studies in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 3 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundIdentification of patients at risk of developing adverse events would enable aggressive medical therapy and possibly targeted revascularization. The aim of this study is to characterize the determinants of long-term outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD).
methodsPatients with a radiological diagnosis of ARVD were recruited into this single-center prospective cohort study between 1986 and 2014. Data collected included baseline co-morbid conditions, annualized prescribed medications and laboratory data (serum creatinine [υmol/L], proteinuria [g/24 h]). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to explore association with these end-points: death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiovascular event (CVE) and the first of any of these events.
resultsA total of 872 patients were recruited into this study. However, 42 patients were excluded due to missing baseline data and hence case records for 830 patients were reviewed. Over median follow-up of 57.1 months (interquartile range: 21.7-96.9), incidence per 100 patient years of death, ESKD, CVE and any event was 13.5, 4.2, 8.9 and 21.0 respectively. Macrovascular disease (MVD), congestive heart failure (CHF), flash pulmonary oedema (FPE) and greater proteinuria at baseline were individually associated with increased risk for all end-points in multivariable analysis (Death: MVD -HR 1.24 [95% CI 1.02-1.50]; CHF -HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.08-1.64]; FPE - HR 2.10 [95% CI 1.50-2.92]; proteinuria - HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.08-1.20]). Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]). Revascularization was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.83]) and ESKD (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46-0.76]).
conclusionAll patients with ARVD require intensive vascular protection therapy to help mitigate systemic atherosclerosis, optimize cardiovascular risk and improve clinical outcomes. More effort is required to identify the minority of patients who may benefit from revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.