Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927186›Full record

Observational studyBMC nephrology2016

Diet as a system: an observational study investigating a multi-choice system of moderately restricted low-protein diets.

Giorgina Barbara Piccoli, Marta Nazha, Irene Capizzi, Federica Neve Vigotti, Stefania Scognamiglio, Valentina Consiglio, Elena Mongilardi, Marilisa Bilocati, Paolo Avagnina, Elisabetta Versino

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Nutritional and Dietary Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Under Conservative and Preservative Kidney Care Without Dialysis.Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Assessing Global Kidney Nutrition Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giorgina Barbara PiccoliDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy. gbpiccoli@yahoo.it.
Marta NazhaSS Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Irene CapizziSS Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Federica Neve VigottiSS Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Stefania ScognamiglioSS Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Valentina ConsiglioSS Nephrology, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Elena MongilardiSCDU Urology, Department of Oncology, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Marilisa BilocatiObstetrics, Department of Surgery, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Paolo AvagninaSSD Clinical Nutrition, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Elisabetta VersinoSS Epidemiology, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, ASOU San Luigi, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no single, gold-standard, low-protein diet (LPD) for CKD patients; the best compliance is probably obtained by personalization. This study tests the hypothesis that a multiple choice diet network allows patients to attain a good compliance level, and that, in an open-choice system, overall results are not dependent upon the specific diet, but upon the clinical characteristics of the patients.

methodsObservational study: Three LPD options were offered to all patients with severe or rapidly progressive CKD: vegan diets supplemented with alpha-ketoacids and essential aminoacids; protein-free food in substitution of normal bread and pasta; other (traditional, vegan non supplemented and tailored). Dialysis-free follow-up and survival were analyzed by Kaplan Meier curves according to diet, comorbidity and age. Compliance and metabolic control were estimated in 147 subjects on diet at March 2015, with recent complete data, prescribed protein intake 0.6 g/Kg/day. Protein intake was assessed by Maroni Mitch formula.

resultsFour hundreds and forty nine patients followed a LPD in December, 2007- March, 2015 (90% moderately restricted LPDs, 0.6 g/Kg/day of protein, 10% at lower targets); age (median 70 (19-97)) and comorbidity (Charlson index: 7) characterized our population as being in line with the usual CKD European population. Median e-GFR at start of the diet was 20 mL/min, 33.2% of the patients were diabetics. Baseline data differ significantly across diets: protein-free schemas are preferred by older, high-comorbidity patients (median age 76 years, Charlson index 8, GFR 20.5 mL/min, Proteinuria: 0.3 g/day), supplemented vegan diets by younger patients with lower GFR and higher proteinuria (median age 65 years, Charlson index 6, GFR 18.9 mL/min; Proteinuria: 1.2 g/day); other diets are chosen by an intermediate population (median age 71 years, Charlson index 6; GFR 22.5 mL/min; Proteinuria: 0.9 g/day); (p <0.001 for age, Charlson index, proteinuria, GFR). Adherence was good, only 1.1% of the patients were lost to follow-up and protein intake was at target in most of the cases with no differences among LPDs (protein intake: 0.47 (0.26-0.86) g/Kg/day). After adjustment for confounders, and/or selection of similar populations, no difference in mortality or dialysis start was observed on the different LPDs. Below the threshold of e-GFR 15 mL/min, 50% of the patients remain dialysis free for at least two years.

conclusionA multiple choice LPD system may allow reaching good adherence, without competition among diets, and with promising results in terms of dialysis-free follow-up. The advantages with respect to a non-customized approach deserve confirmation in further comparative studies or RCTs.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAmino AcidsComorbidityDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsDiet, Protein-RestrictedDiet, VeganFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKeto AcidsMaleAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsKeto AcidsCKDDialysisLow-protein DietMortality

Identifiers

PMID27927186
PMCPMC5142321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.