Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927176›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2016

Colour Doppler analysis of ophthalmic vessels in the diagnosis of carotic artery and retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma: systematic review of test accuracy studies.

Mario Bittner, Livia Faes, Sophie C Boehni, Lucas M Bachmann, Reinier O Schlingemann, Martin K Schmid

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. OCULAR DOPPLER BLOOD FLOW STUDIES IN GLAUCOMA.Journal of the West African College of Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mario BittnerEye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6001, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Livia Faesmedignition Inc, Verena Conzett-Strasse 9, CH-8004, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sophie C BoehniEye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6001, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Lucas M Bachmannmedignition Inc, Verena Conzett-Strasse 9, CH-8004, Zurich, Switzerland. bachmann@medignition.ch.
Reinier O SchlingemannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin K SchmidEye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, CH-6001, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColour Doppler analysis of ophthalmic vessels has been proposed as a promising tool in the diagnosis of various eye diseases, but the available diagnostic evidence has not yet been assessed systematically. We performed a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on the diagnostic properties of Colour Doppler imaging (CDI) assessing ophthalmic vessels and provide an inventory of the available evidence.

methodsEligible papers were searched electronically in (Pre) Medline, Embase and Scopus, and via cross-checking of reference lists. The minimum requirement to be included was the availability of original data and the possibility to construct a two-by-two table. Study selection, critical appraisal using the QUADAS II instrument and extraction of salient study characteristics was made in duplicate. Sensitivity and specificity was computed for each study.

resultsWe included 11 studies (15 two-by-two tables) of moderate methodological quality enrolling 820 participants (range 30 to 118). In 44.4% participants were female (range 37-59% in specific subgroups). CDI was assessed for internal carotid stenosis, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and branch or central retinal vein occlusion diagnosis. There was insufficient data to pool the results for specific illnesses. For the assessments of ophthalmic arteries, mean sensitivity was 0.69 (range 0.27-0.96) with a corresponding mean specificity of 0.83 (range 0.70-0.96). Mean sensitivity of the central retinal artery assessments was 0.58 (range 0.31-0.84) and the corresponding mean specificity was 0.82 (range 0.63-0.94).

conclusionsRobust assessments of the diagnostic value of colour Doppler analysis remain uncommon, limiting the possibilities to extrapolate its true potential for clinical practice. PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014027.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesDiabetic RetinopathyGlaucomaHumansOphthalmic ArteryRegional Blood FlowRetinal ArteryRetinal Vein OcclusionSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Doppler, Color

Identifiers

PMID27927176
PMCPMC5142387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.