Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27927165›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Innate immunity based cancer immunotherapy: B16-F10 murine melanoma model.

Veronika Caisová, Andra Vieru, Zuzana Kumžáková, Simona Glaserová, Hana Husníková, Nikol Vácová, Gabriela Krejčová, Lucie Paďouková, Ivana Jochmanová, Katherine I Wolf and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing innate immune pathways for therapeutic advancement in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating silver nanoparticles and resiquimod as a local melanoma treatment.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Veronika CaisováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Andra VieruDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Zuzana KumžákováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Simona GlaserováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Hana HusníkováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Nikol VácováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Gabriela KrejčováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Lucie PaďoukováDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Ivana Jochmanová1st Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty of P. J. Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia.
Katherine I WolfUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jindřich ChmelařDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jan KopeckýDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jan ŽenkaDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. jzenka@gmail.com.
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing killed microorganisms or their parts to stimulate immunity for cancer treatment dates back to the end of 19

methodsB16-F10 murine melanoma model was used. For the stimulation of phagocytosis, mannan or N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, was covalently bound to tumor cells or attached using hydrophobic anchor. The following agonists of Toll-like receptors were studied: monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA), imiquimod (R-837), resiquimod (R-848), poly(I:C), and heat killed Listeria monocytogenes.

resultsR-848 proved to be the most suitable Toll-like receptor agonist for our novel immunotherapeutic approach. In combination with covalently bound mannan, R-848 significantly reduced tumor growth. Adding poly(I:C) and L. monocytogenes resulted in complete recovery in 83% of mice and in their protection from the re-transplantation of melanoma cells.

conclusionAn efficient cancer treatment results from the combination of Toll-like receptor agonists and phagocytosis stimulating ligands bound to the tumor cells.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateImmunotherapyAnimalsCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImidazolesLigandsMannansMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceNeoplasmsNeutrophil InfiltrationNeutrophilsPhagocytosisPoly I-CCytokinesImidazolesLigandsMannansPoly I-CresiquimodToll-Like ReceptorsCancer immunotherapyInnate immunityMannanMelanomaNeutrophilsPhagocytosisResiquimod

Identifiers

PMID27927165
PMCPMC5142338
OpenAlexW2561974317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.