ArticleBiophysical journal2016
Constriction by Dynamin: Elasticity versus Adhesion.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesoscopic elasticity controls dynamin-driven fission of lipid tubules.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Free energy calculations for membrane morphological transformations and insights to physical biology and oncology.Methods in enzymology · 2024Article
- Quantification and demonstration of the collective constriction-by-ratchet mechanism in the dynamin molecular motor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Polymer-like Model to Study the Dynamics of Dynamin Filaments on Deformable Membrane Tubes.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- The tilted helix model of dynamin oligomers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Article
- The role of traction in membrane curvature generation.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Any cellular fission process is completed when the neck connecting almost-separate membrane compartments is severed. This crucial step is somehow accomplished by proteins from the dynamin family, which polymerize into helical spirals around such necks. Much research has been devoted to elucidating the specifics of that somehow, but despite no shortage of ideas, the question is not settled. Pictorially obvious notions of strangling or pushing are difficult to render in mechanically precise terms. Moreover, because dynamin is a GTPase, it is tempting to speculate that it has a motor activity that assists the necessary severing action, but again the underlying mechanics is not obvious. We believe the difficulty to be the mechanically nontrivial nature of confining elastic filaments onto curved surfaces, for which efficient methods to conceptualize the associated forces and torques have only recently appeared. Here we investigate the implications of a conceptually simple yet mechanically challenging model: consider an elastic helical filament confined to a surface mimicking the neck between two membrane compartments, which we assume to take the shape of a catenoid. What can we say about the expected length of such adsorbed filaments, their shapes, and the forces they exert, as a function of the key parameters in the model? While real dynamin is surely more complex, we consider such a minimal model to be the indispensable baseline. Without knowing what such a model can and cannot explain, it is difficult to justify more complex mechanisms, or understand the constraints under which this machinery evolved in the first place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.