ArticleBiophysical journal2016
Broken TALEs: Transcription Activator-like Effectors Populate Partly Folded States.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stability Islands and the Folding Cooperativity of a Seven-Repeat Array from Topoisomerase V.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
- Unraveling the Mechanics of a Repeat-Protein Nanospring: From Folding of Individual Repeats to Fluctuations of the Superhelix.ACS nano · 2022Article
- Analysis of Tandem Repeat Protein Folding Using Nearest-Neighbor Models.Annual review of biophysics · 2021Review
- A collection of programs for one-dimensional Ising analysis of linear repeat proteins with point substitutions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Functional instability allows access to DNA in longer transcription Activator-Like effector (TALE) arrays.eLife · 2019Article
- Extreme stability in de novo-designed repeat arrays is determined by unusually stable short-range interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription activator-like effector proteins (TALEs) contain large numbers of repeats that bind double-stranded DNA, wrapping around DNA to form a continuous superhelix. Since unbound TALEs retain superhelical structure, it seems likely that DNA binding requires a significant structural distortion or partial unfolding. In this study, we use nearest-neighbor "Ising" analysis of consensus TALE (cTALE) repeat unfolding to quantify intrinsic folding free energies, coupling energies between repeats, and the free energy distribution of partly unfolded states, and to determine how those energies depend on the sequence that determines DNA-specificity (called the "RVD"). We find a moderate level of cooperativity for both the HD and NS RVD sequences (stabilizing interfaces combined with unstable repeats), as has been seen in other linear repeat proteins. Surprisingly, RVD sequence identity influences both the overall stability and the balance of intrinsic repeat stability and interfacial coupling energy. Using parameters from the Ising analysis, we have analyzed the distribution of partly folded states as a function of cTALE length and RVD sequence. We find partly unfolded states where one or more repeats are unfolded to be energetically accessible. Mixing repeats with different RVD sequences increases the population of partially folded states. Local folding free energies plateau for central repeats, suggesting that TALEs access partially folded states where a single internal repeat is unfolded while adjacent repeats remain folded. This breakage should allow TALEs to access superhelically-broken states, and may facilitate DNA binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.