Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27926776›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Synuclein-γ in uterine serous carcinoma impacts survival: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Abigail D Winder, Kruti P Maniar, Jian-Jun Wei, Dachao Liu, Denise M Scholtens, John R Lurain, Julian C Schink, Barbara M Buttin, Virginia L Filiaci, Heather A Lankes and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gamma synuclein promotes cancer metastasis through the MKK3/6-p38MAPK cascade.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Endometrial cancer: a genetic point of view.Translational cancer research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Abigail D WinderDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Kruti P ManiarDivision of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Jian-Jun WeiDivision of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Dachao LiuDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Denise M ScholtensDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
John R LurainDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Julian C SchinkDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Barbara M ButtinDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Virginia L FiliaciStatistics and Data Management Center, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, New York.
Heather A LankesStatistics and Data Management Center, NRG Oncology, Buffalo, New York.
Nilsa C RamirezBiopathology Center and Gynecologic Oncology Group Tissue Bank, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Kay ParkDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Meenakshi SinghDepartment of Pathology, University of Kansas School of Medicine and Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Richard W LiebermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Robert S MannelDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Matthew A PowellDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Floor J BackesDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Cara A MathewsDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Michael L PearlDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDepartment of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
David J PeaceDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois.
David G MutchDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
William T CreasmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
J Julie KimDivision of Reproductive Science in Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Northwestern University · USNorthwestern Medicine · USNRG Oncology · USWashington University in St. Louis · USDuke Medical Center · USGynecologic Oncology Group · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USProvidence College · USSpectrum Health · USStony Brook University Hospital · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Elaina Harper · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
Gynecologic Oncology Group Specimen BankingU24CA114793 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 2005 to 2014
$7.0M
Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
The Role of SNCG in the Carcinogenesis of Uterine Papillary Serous CarcinomaR21CA135467 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KIM, JI-YONG JULIE · 2009 to 2010
$430k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA135467NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114793NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynuclein-γ (SNCG) is highly expressed in advanced solid tumors, including uterine serous carcinoma (USC). The objective of the current study was to determine whether SNCG protein was associated with survival and clinical covariates using the largest existing collection of USCs from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-8023).

methodsHigh-density tissue microarrays (TMAs) of tumor tissues from 313 patients with USC were stained by immunohistochemistry for SNCG, p53, p16, FOLR1, pERK, pAKT, ER, PR, and HER2/neu. Associations of SNCG and other tumor markers with overall and progression-free survival were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional-hazards models, which also were adjusted for age, race, and stage.

resultsThe overall survival at 5 years was 46% for women with high SNCG expression and 62% for those with low SNCG expression (log-rank P = .021; hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.9 in adjusted Cox model). The progression-free survival rate at 5 years was worse for women who had high SNCG expression, at 40%, compared with 56% for those who had low SNCG expression (log-rank P = .0081; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.96-1.92 in adjusted Cox model). High levels of both p53 and p16 were significantly associated with worse overall survival (p53: HR, 4.20 [95% CI, 1.54-11.45]; p16: HR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.01-3.75]) and progression-free survival (p53: HR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.09-4.27]; p16: HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.87-2.69]) compared with low levels.

conclusionsThis largest collection of USCs to date demonstrates that SNCG was associated with poor survival in univariate analyses. SNCG does not predict survival outcome independent of p53 and p16 in models that jointly consider multiple markers. Cancer 2017;123:1144-1155. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAgedAged, 80 and overCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemalegamma-SynucleinGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisUterine NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorgamma-Synucleinendometrial cancerp16p53synuclein-γ (SNCG)uterine serous carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27926776
PMCPMC5360512
OpenAlexW2576207244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.