Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27926593›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2017

Cost-Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in Hepatitis C-Infected Liver Transplant Candidates With Compensated Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

James Salazar, Varun Saxena, James G Kahn, John P Roberts, Neil Mehta, Michael Volk, Jennifer C Lai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Guide to the Economics of Hepatitis C Virus Cure in 2017.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James Salazar1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2 Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 3 Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 4 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplantation Institute, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA.
Varun Saxena
James G Kahn
John P Roberts
Neil Mehta
Michael Volk
Jennifer C Lai
University of California, San Francisco · USLee University · US

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
NRSA Hepatology Training GrantT32DK060414 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Mandana Khalili, JACQUELYN J. MAHER · 2002 to 2026
$6.8M
Frailty and Functional Status in Older Liver Transplant PatientsK23AG048337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAI, JENNIFER C. · 2014 to 2018
$911k
Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteTL1TR000144 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$643k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000144NIA NIH HHS K23 AG048337NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK060414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV)(+) donors represent an effective strategy to increase liver donor availability to HCV-infected recipients. However, many HCV(+) transplant candidates are now receiving treatment with direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) agents that lower the risk of posttransplant HCV recurrence but could make the patient ineligible for HCV(+) livers.

methodsWe compared pretransplant DAA treatment versus deferred DAA treatment using a cost-effectiveness decision analysis model to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (cost per quality-adjusted life year gained) from the societal perspective across a range of HCV(+) liver availability rates. For practical considerations, the population modeled was restricted to well-compensated HCV(+) cirrhotics listed for liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma MELD exception points.

resultsUnder base case conditions, the deferred DAA treatment strategy was found to be the "dominant" strategy. That is, it provided superior health outcomes at cost savings compared to the pretransplant DAA treatment strategy. The pretransplant DAA treatment strategy trended towards cost-effectiveness as HCV(+) donor liver availability declined. However, only in 1 scenario that was highly optimized for favorable outcomes in the pretransplant DAA treatment arm (low availability of HCV(+) organs, low cost of DAA treatment, high cost of HCV recurrence) was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with HCV DAA treatment before transplant less than US $150 000/quality-adjusted life-year gained.

conclusionsDeferring HCV treatment until after liver transplant and maintaining access to the expanded pool of HCV(+) donors appears to be the most cost-effective strategy for well-compensated HCV-infected cirrhotics listed for liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma, even in geographic areas of relatively low HCV(+) donor availability.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisLiver TransplantationAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesCarcinoma, HepatocellularDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFluorenesHepatitis C, ChronicHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMiddle AgedModels, EconomicPostoperative CarePreoperative CareAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesFluorenesledipasvir, sofosbuvir drug combinationRibavirinSofosbuvirUridine Monophosphate

Identifiers

PMID27926593
PMCPMC5403544
OpenAlexW2560157451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.