Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27926559›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the colon and rectum2017

Preoperative Immunonutrition and Elective Colorectal Resection Outcomes.

Lucas W Thornblade, Thomas K Varghese, Xu Shi, Eric K Johnson, Amir Bastawrous, Richard P Billingham, Richard Thirlby, Alessandro Fichera, David R Flum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04059731 (Randomized, Multicentric, Double-blind, Controlled Trial of Parallel Groups to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of a Postoperative Diet With an Oligomeric-hyperprotein-normocaloric Versus Imunonutrients After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04059731 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Multicentric, Double-blind, Controlled Trial of Parallel Groups to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of a Postoperative Diet With an Oligomeric-hyperprotein-normocaloric Versus Imunonutrients After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Universitario Reina Sofía de MurciaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled108ConditionsNutrition Related Neoplasm/Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Surgery--Complications, Site InfectionArmsNutrition supplement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of preoperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Exploring reasons behind patient compliance with nutrition supplements before pelvic exenteration surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Compliance with the Surgery Safety Checklist: An Update on the Status.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Prognostic Nutritional Index Considering Resection Range Is Useful for Predicting Postoperative Morbidity of Hepatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas W Thornblade1 Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 2 Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 3 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 4 Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington 5 Colon and Rectal Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 6 General Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Thomas K Varghese
Xu Shi
Eric K Johnson
Amir Bastawrous
Richard P Billingham
Richard Thirlby
Alessandro Fichera
David R Flum
University of Washington · USSwedish Medical Center · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

Renewal: Gastrointestinal Surgery Outcomes Research FellowshipT32DK070555 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FLUM, DAVID R · 2010 to 2024
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK070555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized controlled trials demonstrate the efficacy of arginine-enriched nutritional supplements (immunonutrition) in reducing complications after surgery. The effectiveness of preoperative immunonutrition has not been evaluated in a community setting.

objectiveThis study aims to determine whether immunonutrition before elective colorectal surgery improves outcomes in the community at large.

designThis is a prospective cohort study with a propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness evaluation. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in Washington State hospitals in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program from 2012 to 2015. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery were selected.

interventionsSurgeons used a preoperative checklist that recommended that patients take oral immunonutrition (237 mL, 3 times daily) for 5 days before elective colorectal resection.

main outcome measuresSerious adverse events (infection, anastomotic leak, reoperation, and death) and prolonged length of stay were the primary outcomes measured.

resultsThree thousand three hundred seventy-five patients (mean age 59.9 ± 15.2 years, 56% female) underwent elective colorectal surgery. Patients receiving immunonutrition more commonly were in a higher ASA class (III-V, 44% vs 38%; p = 0.01) or required an ostomy (18% vs 14%; p = 0.02). The rate of serious adverse events was 6.8% vs 8.3% (p = 0.25) and the rate of prolonged length of stay was 13.8% vs 17.3% (p = 0.04) in those who did and did not receive immunonutrition. After propensity score matching, covariates were similar among 960 patients. Although differences in serious adverse events were nonsignificant (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.16), prolonged length of stay (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.01 p = 0.05) was lower in those receiving immunonutrition. LIMITATIONS: Patient compliance with the intervention was not measured. Residual confounding, including surgeon-level heterogeneity, may influence estimates of the effect of immunonutrition.

conclusionsReductions in prolonged length of stay, likely related to fewer complications, support the use of immunonutrition in quality improvement initiatives related to elective colorectal surgery. This population-based study supports previous trials of immunonutrition, but shows a lower magnitude of benefit, perhaps related to compliance or a lower rate of adverse events, highlighting the value of community-based assessments of comparative effectiveness.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresElective Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAnastomotic LeakArginineCohort StudiesColostomyEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansInfectionsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleArginine

Identifiers

PMID27926559
PMCPMC5147426
OpenAlexW2560516941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.