Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27926519›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-106a in colorectal cancer.

Haibin Hao, Laipeng Liu, Dong Zhang, Chao Wang, Guangfeng Xia, Fuping Zhong, Xiaoyun Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetics of colorectal cancer: biomarker and therapeutic potential.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haibin HaoDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Laipeng LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chao WangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Guangfeng XiaDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Fuping ZhongDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaoyun HuDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to systematically evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value miR106a in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). An original study was conducted to explore correlations between tissue miR106a levels and outcomes for 138 patients diagnosed with CRC. To explore the diagnostic performance of miR106a, eligible studies were identified from medical databases from China and abroad. Based on these results, 15 studies (including our original study) were pooled and included in a meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios of miR106a were 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.57), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), and 7.22 (95% CI: 3.17-16.44) for diagnosis of CRC, and the area under the curve (AUC) for miR106a when diagnosing CRC was 0.72. Patients with higher expression of tissue miR106a had poor overall survival (pooled hazard ratio (HR): 1.50; 95% CI: 1.02-2.20), but not disease-free survival (pooled HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.40-2.65). Overexpression of miR106a may predict superior metastasis-free survival (pooled HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.33-1.27), but the effect was not significant in this study (p = 0.21).

Indexed as

Area Under CurveColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisMicroRNAsMIRN106 microRNA, humancolorectal cancerCRCdiagnosismiR106aprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27926519
PMCPMC5354890
OpenAlexW2558845414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.