Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27926511›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

The relationship of lymphatic vessel density, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Song Zhang, Dong Zhang, Shanhong Yi, Mingfu Gong, Caibao Lu, Yuanqing Cai, Xuefeng Tang, Liguang Zou

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion status in invasive breast cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Song ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Shanhong YiDepartment of Urology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Mingfu GongDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Caibao LuDepartment of Nephrology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Yuanqing CaiDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Xuefeng TangDepartment of Pathology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Liguang ZouDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node status is one of the key parameters used for determining the stage of breast cancer progression. The relationship of lymphatic vessel density (LVD), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and lymph node metastasis (LNM) has not been clearly demonstrated yet. Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception up to 25 May 2016. Spearman correlation coefficient (r) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to determine the relationship within each group. Based on pre-established inclusion criteria, 28 studies involving 2920 breast cancer patients were included in this study. The r values of LVD-LVI, LVD-LNM, and LVI-LNM were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.31 to 0.57), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23 to 0.40), and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.28), respectively. Compared with intratumoral LVD, peritumoral LVD showed more robust correlation with LVI (r = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.72) and LNM (r = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.46). The patients in LNM positive group presented with higher LVI detection rate of 45.85%, while in LNM negative group with detection rate of 23.85%. The results describe a triangle relationship between LVD, LVI, and LNM in breast cancer. Both LVD and LVI are indicated to be valuable predictors of LNM occurrence. Compared with intratumoral lymphatic vessels, peritumoral lymphatics might be the main disseminate route for breast tumor cells.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphatic VesselsLymph NodesNeoplasm InvasivenessPublication Biasbreast cancerlymphatic microvessel densitylymph node metastasislymphovascular invasionmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27926511
PMCPMC5356848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.