Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27925861›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2016

Modeling Heavy-Ion Impairment of Hippocampal Neurogenesis after Acute and Fractionated Irradiation.

Eliedonna Cacao, Francis A Cucinotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Whole-BodyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Late effects ofLife sciences in space research · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Particle Radiation Induced Neurotoxicity in the Central Nervous System.International journal of particle therapy · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliedonna CacaoDepartment of Health Physics and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Francis A CucinottaDepartment of Health Physics and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

(9) Biophysical Description of Age and Dose Dependent Changes to Dendritic Morphology that Impact Cognition following Radiation Cancer TherapyR01CA208526 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI CUCINOTTA, FRANCIS A · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation-induced impairment of neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus is a concern due to its reported association with cognitive detriments after radiotherapy for brain cancers and the possible risks to astronauts chronically exposed to space radiation. Here, we have extended our recent work in a mouse model of impaired neurogenesis after exposure to low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation to heavy ion irradiation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a predictive mathematical model of radiation-induced changes to neurogenesis for a variety of radiation types after acute or fractionated irradiation. We used a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to represent age, time after exposure and dose-dependent changes to several cell populations participating in neurogenesis, as reported in mouse experiments. We considered four compartments to model hippocampal neurogenesis and, consequently, the effects of radiation in altering neurogenesis: 1. neural stem cells (NSCs); 2. neuronal progenitor cells or neuroblasts (NB); 3. immature neurons (ImN); and 4. glioblasts (GB), with additional consideration of microglial activation. The model describes the negative feedback regulation on early and late neuronal proliferation after irradiation, and the dynamics of the age dependence of neurogenesis. We compared our model to experimental data for X rays, and protons, carbon and iron particles, including data for fractionated iron-particle irradiation. Heavy-ion irradiation is predicted to lead to poor recovery or no recovery from impaired neurogenesis at doses as low as 0.5 Gy in mice. This is only partially ameliorated by dose fractionation, which suggests important implications for Hardon therapy near the Bragg peak, and possibly for space radiation exposures as well. Predictions of the threshold doses where neurogenesis recovery fails for given radiation types are described, and the role of subthreshold transient impairments are briefly discussed.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationModels, BiologicalAnimalsHeavy IonsHippocampusMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeurogenesisNeuronsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27925861
PMCPMC5545979
OpenAlexW2559753181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.