Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27924912›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Next-generation systematics: An innovative approach to resolve the structure of complex prokaryotic taxa.

Vartul Sangal, Michael Goodfellow, Amanda L Jones, Edward C Schwalbe, Jochen Blom, Paul A Hoskisson, Iain C Sutcliffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rhodopyran, a carboxylated hexahydrocyclopenta[Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polyphasic Characterization ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Generalization of Classification of AlkB Family Alkane Monooxygenases fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimization ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lacrimispora defluvii PI-S10-B5ACurrent microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Production of biopolymer precursors beta-alanine and L-lactic acid from COFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Complete Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vartul SangalFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Michael GoodfellowSchool of Biology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Amanda L JonesFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Edward C SchwalbeFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Jochen BlomHeinrich-Buff-Ring 58, Justus-Liebig-Universität, 35392 Gießen, Germany.
Paul A HoskissonStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK.
Iain C SutcliffeFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prokaryotic systematics provides the fundamental framework for microbiological research but remains a discipline that relies on a labour- and time-intensive polyphasic taxonomic approach, including DNA-DNA hybridization, variation in 16S rRNA gene sequence and phenotypic characteristics. These techniques suffer from poor resolution in distinguishing between closely related species and often result in misclassification and misidentification of strains. Moreover, guidelines are unclear for the delineation of bacterial genera. Here, we have applied an innovative phylogenetic and taxogenomic approach to a heterogeneous actinobacterial taxon, Rhodococcus, to identify boundaries for intrageneric and supraspecific classification. Seven species-groups were identified within the genus Rhodococcus that are as distantly related to one another as they are to representatives of other mycolic acid containing actinobacteria and can thus be equated with the rank of genus. It was also evident that strains assigned to rhodococcal species-groups are underspeciated with many misclassified using conventional taxonomic criteria. The phylogenetic and taxogenomic methods used in this study provide data of theoretical value for the circumscription of generic and species boundaries and are also of practical significance as they provide a robust basis for the classification and identification of rhodococci of agricultural, industrial and medical/veterinary significance.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPhylogenyBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicNucleic Acid HybridizationRhodococcusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityWhole Genome SequencingDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27924912
PMCPMC5141411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.