Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27924831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Incidence, risk factors and impact on outcomes of secondary infection in patients with septic shock: an 8-year retrospective study.

Guang-Ju Zhao, Dong Li, Qian Zhao, Jia-Xing Song, Xiao-Rong Chen, Guang-Liang Hong, Meng-Fang Li, Bing Wu, Zhong-Qiu Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sympathetic regulation of the host immune response to bacterial sepsis.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guang-Ju ZhaoEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Dong LiEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Qian ZhaoEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Jia-Xing SongEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Xiao-Rong ChenEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Guang-Liang HongEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Meng-Fang LiEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Bing WuEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.
Zhong-Qiu LuEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P.R.China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary infection in septic patients has received widespread attention, although clinical data are still lacking. The present study was performed on 476 patients with septic shock. Time trends for mortality were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation test. Risk factors for secondary infection were investigated by binary logistic regression. The extended Cox model with time-varying covariates and hazard ratios (HR) was performed to determine the impact of secondary infection on mortality. Differences in hospital length of stay (LOS) between patients with and without secondary infection were calculated using a multistate model. Thirty-nine percent of septic shock patients who survived the early phase of the disease developed secondary infection. There was a statistically significant increased odds ratio for secondary infection in older patients and patients with a longer LOS in the intensive care unit (ICU), a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and endotracheal intubation. Secondary infection significantly reduced the rate of discharge (HR 5.607; CI

Indexed as

AgedAPACHECoinfectionCritical IllnessFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID27924831
PMCPMC5141415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.