Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27924361›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2017

Prevalence of non-cardiovascular findings on CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease.

Archana Malik, Jeffrey C Hellinger, Sabah Servaes, Mathew C Schwartz, Marc S Keller, Monica Epelman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Archana MalikDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeffrey C HellingerDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sabah ServaesDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mathew C SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marc S KellerDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Monica EpelmanDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. monica.epelman@nemours.org.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USLenox Hill Hospital · USNemours Children's Health System · USSt. Christopher's Hospital for Children · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCT angiography is gaining broader acceptance in the evaluation of children with known or suspected congenital heart disease. These studies include non-cardiovascular structures such as the mediastinum, lung parenchyma and upper abdominal organs. It is important to inspect all these structures for potential abnormalities that might be clinically important and, in some cases, may impact care plans.

objectiveTo determine the prevalence of non-cardiovascular findings in CT angiography of children with congenital heart disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsDuring 28 months, 300 consecutive children (170 males; mean age: 7.1 years, age range: 6 h-26 years), referred from a tertiary pediatric cardiology center, underwent clinically indicated CT angiography to evaluate known or suspected congenital heart disease. Slightly more than half (n = 169) of the patients were postoperative or post-intervention. Examinations were retrospectively reviewed, and non-cardiovascular findings were recorded and tabulated by organ system, congenital heart disease and operative procedure in conjunction with outcomes from medical charts.

resultsNon-cardiovascular findings were identified in 83% (n = 250 / 300) of the studies for a total of 857 findings. In 221 patients (n = 73.7% of 300) a total of 813 non-cardiovascular findings were clinically significant, while in 9.7% (n = 29 / 300) of patients, 5.1% (n = 44 / 857) of the findings were nonsignificant. In 38.3% (n = 115 / 300) of patients with significant non-cardiovascular pathology, the findings were unexpected and directly impacted patient care plans. Commonly involved organs with non-cardiovascular findings were the lungs with 280 non-cardiovascular findings in 176 / 300 (58.7%) of patients, the airway with 139 non-cardiovascular findings in 103 / 300 (34.3%) of patients and the liver with 108 non-cardiovascular findings in 72 / 300 (24.0%) of patients. Syndromic associations were noted in 22% (n = 66 / 300) of the patients.

conclusionNon-cardiovascular findings are common in children with congenital heart disease who undergo CT angiography. Based upon our study population, if a child with congenital heart disease has a CT angiography, five out of six will have non-cardiovascular findings, while nearly three out of four (73.7%; 221 / 300) will have significant non-cardiovascular findings. Close attention to the non-cardiovascular structures in children with congenital heart disease presenting for a CT angiography is recommended as in nearly 40% of these children, findings were unexpected and directly altered patient care.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyIncidental FindingsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesChildrenComputed tomography angiographyCongenital heart diseaseExtracardiac findingsNon-cardiovascular findings

Identifiers

PMID27924361
OpenAlexW2560636789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.