Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27924264›Full record

ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2016

Specificity of broad protein interaction surfaces for proteins with multiple binding partners.

Nobuyuki Uchikoga, Yuri Matsuzaki, Masahito Ohue, Yutaka Akiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preface of Special Issue "Protein-Ligand Interactions".Biophysics and physicobiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nobuyuki UchikogaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan.
Yuri MatsuzakiEducation Academy of Computational Life Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.
Masahito OhueDepartment of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.
Yutaka AkiyamaEducation Academy of Computational Life Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan; Department of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of protein-protein interaction networks has revealed the presence of proteins with multiple interaction ligand proteins, such as hub proteins. For such proteins, multiple ligands would be predicted as interacting partners when predicting all-to-all protein-protein interactions (PPIs). In this work, to obtain a better understanding of PPI mechanisms, we focused on protein interaction surfaces, which differ between protein pairs. We then performed rigid-body docking to obtain information of interfaces of a set of decoy structures, which include many possible interaction surfaces between a certain protein pair. Then, we investigated the specificity of sets of decoy interactions between true binding partners in each case of alpha-chymotrypsin, actin, and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 as test proteins having multiple true binding partners. To observe differences in interaction surfaces of docking decoys, we introduced broad interaction profiles (BIPs), generated by assembling interaction profiles of decoys for each protein pair. After cluster analysis, the specificity of BIPs of true binding partners was observed for each receptor. We used two types of BIPs: those involved in amino acid sequences (BIP-seqs) and those involved in the compositions of interacting amino acid residue pairs (BIP-AAs). The specificity of a BIP was defined as the number of group members including all true binding partners. We found that BIP-AA cases were more specific than BIP-seq cases. These results indicated that the composition of interacting amino acid residue pairs was sufficient for determining the properties of protein interaction surfaces.

Indexed as

hub proteininteraction profilepostdocking processprotein-protein interactionrigid-body docking process

Identifiers

PMID27924264
PMCPMC5042157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.