Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27924104›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

State of newborn health in India.

M J Sankar, S B Neogi, J Sharma, M Chauhan, R Srivastava, P K Prabhakar, A Khera, R Kumar, S Zodpey, V K Paul

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06377397 (Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates At-risk of Early-onset Bacterial Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06377397 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates At-risk of Early-onset Bacterial Sepsis: a Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial (the SAUNA Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndian Council of Medical ResearchRan2024 to 2028Enrolled1,500ConditionsSepsis, PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy), Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, Preterm Premature Rupture of MembraneArmsAntibiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Overview of Global Challenges in Dealing with Neonatal Sepsis and Responsibility of Healthcare Workers": A Narrative Review.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Skin Care Practices in Indian Newborns and Infants: Current Scenario.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M J SankarDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
S B NeogiIndian Institute of Public Health (Delhi), Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.
J SharmaIndian Institute of Public Health (Delhi), Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.
M ChauhanIndian Institute of Public Health (Delhi), Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.
R SrivastavaMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
P K PrabhakarMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
A KheraMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
R KumarMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
S ZodpeyIndian Institute of Public Health (Delhi), Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.
V K PaulDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 0.75 million neonates die every year in India, the highest for any country in the world. The neonatal mortality rate (NMR) declined from 52 per 1000 live births in 1990 to 28 per 1000 live births in 2013, but the rate of decline has been slow and lags behind that of infant and under-five child mortality rates. The slower decline has led to increasing contribution of neonatal mortality to infant and under-five mortality. Among neonatal deaths, the rate of decline in early neonatal mortality rate (ENMR) is much lower than that of late NMR. The high level and slow decline in early NMR are also reflected in a high and stagnant perinatal mortality rate. The rate of decline in NMR, and to an extent ENMR, has accelerated with the introduction of National Rural Health Mission in mid-2005. Almost all states have witnessed this phenomenon, but there is still a huge disparity in NMR between and even within the states. The disparity is further compounded by rural-urban, poor-rich and gender differentials. There is an interplay of different demographic, educational, socioeconomic, biological and care-seeking factors, which are responsible for the differentials and the high burden of neonatal mortality. Addressing inequity in India is an important cross-cutting action that will reduce newborn mortality.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityCause of DeathChild, PreschoolHumansIndiaInfantInfant HealthInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureProgram DevelopmentQuality of Health CareRural PopulationUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID27924104
PMCPMC5144119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.