Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27924014›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible.

Damian Szklarczyk, John H Morris, Helen Cook, Michael Kuhn, Stefan Wyder, Milan Simonovic, Alberto Santos, Nadezhda T Doncheva, Alexander Roth, Peer Bork and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4,001 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4,001citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4,001 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3,941 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Damian SzklarczykInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
John H MorrisResource on Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158-2517, USA.
Helen CookNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Michael KuhnStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan WyderInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Milan SimonovicInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Alberto SantosNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Nadezhda T DonchevaNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Alexander RothInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Peer BorkStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany bork@embl.de.
Lars J JensenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark lars.juhl.jensen@cpr.ku.dk.
Christian von MeringInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland mering@imls.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-9102

Funding

TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
Resource for Biocomputing Visualization and InformaticsP41GM103311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2012 to 2017
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103311NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A system-wide understanding of cellular function requires knowledge of all functional interactions between the expressed proteins. The STRING database aims to collect and integrate this information, by consolidating known and predicted protein-protein association data for a large number of organisms. The associations in STRING include direct (physical) interactions, as well as indirect (functional) interactions, as long as both are specific and biologically meaningful. Apart from collecting and reassessing available experimental data on protein-protein interactions, and importing known pathways and protein complexes from curated databases, interaction predictions are derived from the following sources: (i) systematic co-expression analysis, (ii) detection of shared selective signals across genomes, (iii) automated text-mining of the scientific literature and (iv) computational transfer of interaction knowledge between organisms based on gene orthology. In the latest version 10.5 of STRING, the biggest changes are concerned with data dissemination: the web frontend has been completely redesigned to reduce dependency on outdated browser technologies, and the database can now also be queried from inside the popular Cytoscape software framework. Further improvements include automated background analysis of user inputs for functional enrichments, and streamlined download options. The STRING resource is available online, at http://string-db.org/.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinSoftwareComputational BiologyModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipUser-Computer InterfaceWeb BrowserProteins

Identifiers

PMID27924014
PMCPMC5210637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.