Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27923996›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Binding of MBD proteins to DNA blocks Tet1 function thereby modulating transcriptional noise.

Anne K Ludwig, Peng Zhang, Florian D Hastert, Stephanie Meyer, Cathia Rausch, Henry D Herce, Udo Müller, Anne Lehmkuhl, Ines Hellmann, Carina Trummer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Stochastic modeling of epigenetic memory.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Epigenetic dynamics in cancer stem cell dormancy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne K LudwigCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Peng ZhangCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Florian D HastertCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Stephanie MeyerCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Cathia RauschCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Henry D HerceCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Udo MüllerHuman Biology and BioImaging, Department of Biology II, LMU Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Anne LehmkuhlCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Ines HellmannAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department Biology II, LMU Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Carina TrummerHuman Biology and BioImaging, Department of Biology II, LMU Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Christian StormChemical Plant Ecology, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Heinrich LeonhardtHuman Biology and BioImaging, Department of Biology II, LMU Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
M Cristina CardosoCell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Technical University of Darmstadt · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant DNA methylation is a hallmark of various human disorders, indicating that the spatial and temporal regulation of methylation readers and modifiers is imperative for development and differentiation. In particular, the cross-regulation between 5-methylcytosine binders (MBD) and modifiers (Tet) has not been investigated. Here, we show that binding of Mecp2 and Mbd2 to DNA protects 5-methylcytosine from Tet1-mediated oxidation. The mechanism is not based on competition for 5-methylcytosine binding but on Mecp2 and Mbd2 directly restricting Tet1 access to DNA. We demonstrate that the efficiency of this process depends on the number of bound MBDs per DNA molecule. Accordingly, we find 5-hydroxymethylcytosine enriched at heterochromatin of Mecp2-deficient neurons of a mouse model for Rett syndrome and Tet1-induced reexpression of silenced major satellite repeats. These data unveil fundamental regulatory mechanisms of Tet enzymes and their potential pathophysiological role in Rett syndrome. Importantly, it suggests that Mecp2 and Mbd2 have an essential physiological role as guardians of the epigenome.

Indexed as

5-MethylcytosineAnimalsCells, CulturedDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, SatelliteHumansMaleMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2MiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNeuronsOxidation-ReductionProto-Oncogene ProteinsRats5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-MethylcytosineDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, SatelliteMbd2 protein, mouseMecp2 protein, mouseMecp2 protein, ratMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Proto-Oncogene ProteinsTET1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID27923996
PMCPMC5389475
OpenAlexW2584204419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.