Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27923988›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2017

Functional Analysis of Cellulose Synthase (CESA) Protein Class Specificity.

Manoj Kumar, Ivan Atanassov, Simon Turner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The knockout of ClaCSLH1 induced dwarfing in watermelon.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dual RNA-seq of maize andFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  15. Identification of a highly drought-resistantFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manoj KumarUniversity of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9173-3872
Ivan AtanassovUniversity of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7771-3629
Simon TurnerUniversity of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom simon.turner@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4859-1068
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C511064/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H012923/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellulose synthase complex (CSC) exhibits a 6-fold symmetry and is known as a "rosette." Each CSC is believed to contain between 18 and 24 CESA proteins that each synthesize an individual glucan chain. These chains form the microfibrils that confer the remarkable structural properties of cellulose. At least three different classes of CESA proteins are essential to form the CSC However, while organization of the CSC determines microfibril structure, how individual CESA proteins are organized within the CSC remains unclear. Parts of the plant CESA proteins map sufficiently well onto the bacterial CESA (BcsA) structure, indicating that they are likely to share a common catalytic mechanism. However, plant CESA proteins are much larger than the bacterial BcsA protein, prompting the suggestion that these plant-specific regions are important for interactions between CESA proteins and for conferring CESA class specificity. In this study, we have undertaken a comprehensive analysis of well-defined regions of secondary cell wall CESA proteins, with the aim of defining what distinguishes different CESA proteins and hence what determines the specificity of each CESA class. Our results demonstrate that CESA class specificity extends throughout the protein and not just in the highly variable regions. Furthermore, we find that different CESA isoforms vary greatly in their levels of site specificity and this is likely to be determined by the constraints imposed by their position within the CSC rather than their primary structure.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceArabidopsisCelluloseComputational BiologyGene Knockout TechniquesGenes, PlantGenetic Complementation TestGlucosyltransferasesMutationPhenotypePlants, Genetically ModifiedSubstrate SpecificityTransformation, GeneticCellulosecellulose synthaseGlucosyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID27923988
PMCPMC5291044
OpenAlexW2560524431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.