Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27923975›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2016

Efficacy of nonselective optogenetic control of the medial septum over hippocampal oscillations: the influence of speed and implications for cognitive enhancement.

Benjamin J Blumberg, Sean P Flynn, Sylvain J Barriere, Philippe R Mouchati, Rod C Scott, Gregory L Holmes, Jeremy M Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The medial septum enhances reversal learning via opposing actions on ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra dopamine neurons.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Medial septum differentially regulates dopamine neuron activity in the rat ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra via distinct pathways.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin J BlumbergDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Sean P FlynnDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Sylvain J BarriereDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Philippe R MouchatiDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Rod C ScottDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Gregory L HolmesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Jeremy M BarryDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont jbarry4@uvm.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment Following Early-Life SeizuresR01NS073083 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HOLMES, GREGORY L. · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics holds great promise for both the dissection of neural circuits and the evaluation of theories centered on the temporal organizing properties of oscillations that underpin cognition. To date, no studies have examined the efficacy of optogenetic stimulation for altering hippocampal oscillations in freely moving wild-type rats, or how these alterations would affect performance on behavioral tasks. Here, we used an AAV virus to express ChR2 in the medial septum (MS) of wild-type rats, and optically stimulated septal neurons at 6 Hz and 30 Hz. We measured the corresponding effects of these stimulations on the oscillations of the MS and hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3 in three different contexts: (1) With minimal movement while the rats sat in a confined chamber; (2) Explored a novel open field; and (3) Learned and performed a T-maze behavioral task. While control yellow light stimulation did not affect oscillations, 6-Hz blue light septal stimulations altered hippocampal theta oscillations in a manner that depended on the animal's mobility and speed. While the 30 Hz blue light septal stimulations only altered theta frequency in CA1 while the rat had limited mobility, it robustly increased the amplitude of hippocampal signals at 30 Hz in both regions in all three recording contexts. We found that animals were more likely to make a correct choice during Day 1 of T-maze training during both MS stimulation protocols than during control stimulation, and that improved performance was independent of theta frequency alterations.

Indexed as

CognitionGamma RhythmTheta RhythmAnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalCA3 Region, HippocampalMaleMaze LearningOptogeneticsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCognitiongammaoptogeneticsoscillationstheta

Identifiers

PMID27923975
PMCPMC5357822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.