Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27923501›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2017

Influenza A virus vaccines for swine.

Amy L Vincent, Daniel R Perez, Daniela Rajao, Tavis K Anderson, Eugenio J Abente, Rasna R Walia, Nicola S Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy L VincentNational Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA, USA. Electronic address: Amy.vincent@ars.usda.gov.
Daniel R PerezDepartment of Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Daniela RajaoNational Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA, USA.
Tavis K AndersonNational Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA, USA.
Eugenio J AbenteNational Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA, USA.
Rasna R WaliaNational Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA, USA.
Nicola S LewisDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
National Animal Disease Center · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Immune factors in vaccine-enhanced pandemic H1N1 influenza diseaseR21AI098079 · NIAID · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SANDBULTE, MATTHEW R, VINCENT, AMY L. · 2012 to 2013
$407k
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008CNIAID NIH HHS R21 AI098079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic losses due to influenza A virus (IAV) infections are substantial and a global problem, ranking among the top three major health challenges in the swine industry. Currently, H1 and H3 subtypes circulate in pigs globally associated with different combinations of N1 and N2 subtypes; however, the origin, gene constellation, and antigenic makeup of IAV vary greatly on different continents. Vaccination is one means of mitigating the effects of IAV disease, and vaccines are most effective if the strains included closely match the currently circulating strains in pigs. Genetic analyses provide panoramic views of the virus landscape at the sequence level and, thus, can aid in the selection of well-matched swine IAV vaccine strains, but is not sufficient alone. Additionally, a major challenge in selecting appropriate swine IAV vaccine strains is the co-circulation of multiple lineages of viruses in the same region, requiring multivalent or broadly cross-reacting antigens. Due to this complex IAV ecology in swine, new vaccination strategies and vaccine platforms are needed. The hemagglutinin (HA) viral protein is the major target of neutralizing antibodies, which are widely considered to be correlated with protection. Virus variants that are not recognized by previously elicited antibodies can render traditional vaccines that primarily elicit humoral responses ineffective, and therefore result in the need for vaccine strain reformulation and re-vaccination. In the future, new vaccine platforms may be on the market that will provide alternative options to those currently available. Nonetheless, a collaborative approach is needed to improve IAV vaccine strain selection for use in swine.

Indexed as

AnimalsInfluenza A virusInfluenza VaccinesOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSwineSwine DiseasesVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesH1N1H1N2H3N2Influenza A virusSwineVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27923501
PMCPMC8609643
OpenAlexW2550093899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.