Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27923409›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages.

Amaia Izeta-Alberdi, Carlos N Ibarra-Cerdeña, David A Moo-Llanes, Janine M Ramsey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fighting Strategies Against Chagas' Disease: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The epidemiology of Chagas disease in the Americas.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024
    Review
  11. Characterization of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Fifteen Years after the Definition ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Clinical use of molecular methods forFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
  15. Animal Models ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Surveillance and genotype characterization of zoonotic trypanosomatidae inInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amaia Izeta-AlberdiEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Carlos N Ibarra-CerdeñaDepartamento de Ecología Humana, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (Cinvestav) Unidad Mérida, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
David A Moo-LlanesCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Janine M RamseyCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico. janineramseyw@gmail.com.
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite's evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published.

methodsThe current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities.

resultsFew studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions.

conclusionsMore rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsChagas DiseaseGenetic VariationGenotypeHost SpecificityHumansPhylogenyPhylogeographyTrypanosoma cruziChagas diseaseDiscrete Type UnitEcological niche modelingHost specificityNiche identityTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID27923409
PMCPMC5142175
OpenAlexW2560591852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.