Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27923035›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2017

Biomarkers in anal cancer: from biological understanding to stratified treatment.

Christopher M Jones, Vicky Goh, David Sebag-Montefiore, Duncan C Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognostic Value ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher M JonesLeeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Vicky GohDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
David Sebag-MontefioreLeeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Duncan C GilbertSussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 19121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinomas of the anus and anal canal represent a model of a cancer and perhaps the first where level 1 evidence supported primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in treating locoregional disease with curative intent. The majority of tumours are associated with infection with oncogenic subtypes of human papilloma virus and this plays a significant role in their sensitivity to treatment. However, not all tumours are cured with CRT and there remain opportunities to improve outcomes in terms of oncological control and also reducing late toxicities. Understanding the biology of ASCC promises to allow a more personalised approach to treatment, with the development and validation of a range of biomarkers and associated techniques that are the focus of this review.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Transformation, ViralChemoradiotherapyHumansPapillomaviridaeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27923035
PMCPMC5243987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.