ArticleASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
Bioengineered Renal Cell Therapy Device for Clinical Translation.
Article in ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable, wearable and implantable artificial kidney systems: needs, opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Novel strategies in nephrology: what to expect from the future?Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- Kidney-on-a-chip: untapped opportunities.Kidney international · 2018Review
- Hydrogel-Based Cell Therapies for Kidney Regeneration: Current Trends in Biofabrication and In Vivo Repair.Current pharmaceutical design · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bioartificial renal epithelial cell system (BRECS) is a cell-based device to treat acute kidney injury through renal cell therapy from an extracorporeal circuit. To enable widespread implementation of cell therapy, the BRECS was designed to be cryopreserved as a complete device, cryostored, cryoshipped to an end-use site, thawed as a complete device, and employed in a therapeutic extracorporeal hemofiltration circuit. This strategy overcomes storage and distribution issues that have been previous barriers to cell therapy. Previous BRECS housings produced by computer numerical control (CNC) machining, a slow process taking hours to produce one bioreactor, was also prohibitively expensive (>$600/CNC-BRECS); major obstacles to mass production. The goal of this study was to produce a BRECS to be mass produced by injection-molded BRECS (IM-BRECS), decreasing cost (<$20/unit), and improving manufacturing speed (hundreds of units/h), while maintaining the same cell therapy function as the previous CNC-BRECS, first evaluated through prototypes produced by stereolithography BRECS (SLA-BRECS). The finalized IM-BRECS design had a significantly lower fill volume (10 ml), mass (49 g), and footprint (8.5 cm × 8.5 cm × 1.5 cm), and was demonstrated to outperform the previous BRECS designs with respect to heat transfer, significantly improving control of cooling during cryopreservation and reducing thaw times during warming. During in vitro culture, IM-BRECS performed similarly to previous CNC-BRECS with respect to cell metabolic activity (lactate production, oxygen consumption, and glutathione metabolism) and amount of cells supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.