ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2017
Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI-derived prostate volume assessment: manual segmentation versus two-axis ellipsoid approximation and its implications for PSA density.European radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating Differential Metabolic Profiles by Prostate Cancer Risk Among Prostate Cancer Patients.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- CpG dinucleotide methylation of the SPDEF gene as a blood-based epigenetic biomarker for prostate cancer diagnosis.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Utility of Combining Prostate Health Index and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Article
- Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Observational
- Pathologic response as an early endpoint for survival following neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy plus abiraterone acetate for metastatic prostate cancer.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- External Validation of a Digital Pathology-based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Architecture in the NRG/RTOG 9902 Phase 3 Trial.European urology oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical Implementation of a Noninvasive, Multi-Analyte Droplet Digital PCR Test to Screen for Androgen Receptor Alterations.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2024Article
- The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Review
- ExoDx test for prostate cancer: the future is liquid-Editorial Comment.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Article
- Standardized prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates following initial non-malignant biopsy result.BJU international · 2023Article
- A prospective study of the prostate health index density and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer.Investigative and clinical urology · 2023Article
- Circulating metabolite biomarkers: a game changer in the human prostate cancer diagnosis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with abiraterone acetate in patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: When to perform radical prostatectomy?Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Tumor suppressive miR-99b-5p as an epigenomic regulator mediating mTOR/AR/SMARCD1 signaling axis in aggressive prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The diagnostic effectiveness of serum sialic acid predicts both qualitative and quantitative prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 20 ng/mL.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on serum PSA testing and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and histopathologic evaluation of prostate biopsies. The main drawback of PSA testing is the lack of specificity for PCa. To improve early detection of PCa more specific biomarkers are needed. In the past few years, many new promising biomarkers have been identified; however, to date, only a few have reached clinical practice.
methodsIn this review, we discuss new blood-based and urinary biomarker models that are promising for usage in PCa detection, follow-up and treatment decision-making. These include Prostate Health Index (PHI), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), four-kallikrein panel (4K), transmembrane protease serine 2-ERG (TMPRSS2-ERG), ExoDx Prostate Intelliscore, SelectMDx and the Mi-Prostate score. Only few head-to-head studies are available for these new fluid-based biomarkers and/or models. The blood-based PHI and urinary PCA3 are two US Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers for diagnosis of PCa. In the second part of this review, we give an overview of published studies comparing these two available biomarkers for prediction of (1) PCa upon prostate biopsy, (2) pathological features in radical prostatectomy specimen and (3) significant PCa in patients eligible for active surveillance.
resultsStudies show opposing results in comparison of PHI with PCA3 for prediction of PCa upon initial and repeat prostate biopsy. PHI and PCA3 are able to predict pathological findings on radical prostatectomy specimen, such as tumor volume and Gleason score. Only PHI could predict seminal vesicle invasion and only PCA3 could predict multifocality. There is some evidence that PHI outperforms PCA3 in predicting significant PCa in an active surveillance population.
conclusionsFuture research should focus on independent validation of promising fluid-based biomarkers/models, and prospective comparison of biomarkers with each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27922627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.