Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27922029›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2017

Safety of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.

Brooks D Cash, Brian E Lacy, Philip S Schoenfeld, Leonard S Dove, Paul S Covington

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of Eluxadoline Effect on Cardiac Repolarization.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2018
    Trial
  2. Irritable bowel syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Medical Management Update.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Update on Pharmacotherapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019
    Review
  19. The impact of treatment with eluxadoline on health-related quality of life among adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brooks D CashDepartment of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Brian E LacyDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Philip S SchoenfeldUniversity of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Leonard S DoveFuriex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an affiliate of Allergan plc, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA.
Paul S CovingtonFuriex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an affiliate of Allergan plc, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA.
Leonard Cheshire · GBAllergan (United States) · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEluxadoline is a mixed μ-opioid receptor (OR) and κ-OR agonist and δ-OR antagonist, approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). This analysis evaluated the safety and tolerability of eluxadoline 75 and 100 mg twice daily (BID) in one Phase 2 (IBS-2001) and two Phase 3 (IBS-3001 and IBS-3002) studies.

methodsAdults with IBS-D (Rome III criteria) were randomized to placebo or eluxadoline (75 or 100 mg) BID for 12 (IBS-2001), 26 (IBS-3002), or 52 (IBS-3001) weeks. Safety data were pooled. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed, with special focus on opioid-related AEs, including suspected sphincter of Oddi spasm (SOS) events.

results2,776 patients were included in the enrolled set; the safety set comprised 2,814 patients, based on actual treatments received. The most frequent AEs in the placebo and eluxadoline 75 and 100 mg groups were constipation (2.5, 7.4, and 8.1%, respectively) and nausea (5.0, 8.1, and 7.1%, respectively); discontinuation due to constipation was uncommon (0.3, 1.1, and 1.5%, respectively). Ten SOS events (10/1,839; 0.5%) occurred in eluxadoline-treated patients, manifesting as acute abdominal pain with elevated aminotransferases or lipase, or pancreatitis; all occurred in patients without a gallbladder. Eight of these events occurred with the higher dose of eluxadoline, within 1 week of initiation of therapy, and all resolved with eluxadoline discontinuation. There were five events independently adjudicated as pancreatitis not associated with SOS, three of which were associated with heavy alcohol use.

conclusionsEluxadoline was well tolerated in Phase 2 and 3 trials, with constipation and nausea the most common AEs. Consistent with the known adverse effects of opioid agonists, clinically apparent SOS events were observed in eluxadoline-treated patients. All occurred in patients without a gallbladder and the majority were observed in patients on the higher dose of eluxadoline, suggesting a possible association.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdultAgedConstipationDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansImidazolesIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedNauseaPancreatitisPhenylalanineeluxadolineGastrointestinal AgentsImidazolesPhenylalanineReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID27922029
PMCPMC5318664
OpenAlexW2559817363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.