Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2017
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Examine the Effectiveness of Lubiprostone on Constipation Symptoms and Colon Transit Time in Diabetic Patients.
Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07277907 (Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in the Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in the Treatment of Slow Transit Constipation: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Guideline
- Effects of Elobixibat in Patients with Diabetes and Concomitant Chronic Constipation: an 8-week, Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm Study.Advances in therapy · 2022Trial
- Diabetic gastroenteropathy: a pan-alimentary complication.Diabetologia · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on the Gastrointestinal System.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Efficacy of Lubiprostone in Patients of Constipation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Constipation among workers with depression/anxiety: a retrospective study using a claims database and survey data in Japan.BMJ open · 2024Observational
- 2022 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023Review
- Imaging Classification of Constipation.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023Article
- [Diabetic gastroenteropathy: modern methods of diagnosis and treatment].Problemy endokrinologii · 2022Article
- Effect of visfatin on KAging · 2022Article
- Article
- Diabetic gastroenteropathy: An underdiagnosed complication.World journal of diabetes · 2021Review
- Differences in efficacy and safety of lubiprostone used for idiopathic vs opioid-induced constipation: meta-analysis of East Asian and Western populations.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2020Review
- The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation in the USA: A Systematic Literature Review.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2020Review
- A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial on the Effect of Magnesium Oxide in Patients With Chronic Constipation.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019Article
- Diabetic Gastroparesis.Endocrine reviews · 2019Review
- Update on treatments for nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease-an evidence-based medicine review.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2019Review
- Pathophysiology and management of diabetic gastroenteropathy.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Recent advances in understanding and managing chronic constipation.F1000Research · 2018Review
- Colonic transit time and pressure based on Bernoulli's principle.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesConstipation is the most common GI symptom in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Importantly, patients with constipation have lower health-related quality of life than those without constipation. Effective therapies for constipation are limited and there is a paucity of data evaluating the treatment of constipation in diabetics.
methodsDiabetic patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) as defined by Rome III criteria were recruited from outpatient clinics at a tertiary-care center and a Veterans Administration Hospital. Demographic data, baseline stool patterns, and a constipation-specific quality of life survey (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL)) were obtained. Baseline colonic transit time (CTT) was evaluated utilizing the wireless motility capsule. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 48 mcg per day lubiprostone or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point measured was the difference in number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week vs. baseline for each group at each week after initiation of therapy. Secondary end points included changes in CTT after 4 weeks of therapy, PAC-QOL after 8 weeks of therapy, and changes from baseline in associated gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms as well as need for rescue medication at 2, 4, and 8 weeks.
resultsSeventy-six patients (mean age, 56.9±9.1 years, 62% females) were randomized. There were no significant differences between the two groups' baseline data or demographics. During the 8-week treatment period, patients in the lubiprostone group experienced an average of 1.83±0.80 (P=0.02) more SBMs per week than those in the placebo group as compared with baseline. The duration of CTT at Week 4 was shorter by an average of 13 h compared with baseline in the lubiprostone group, and was prolonged by an average of 7 h compared with baseline in the placebo group, leading to a treatment effect of 20.3±7.3 h (P=0.006). PAC-QOL improved in both the groups; however, there was no significant difference between the groups. There was no difference in associated GI symptoms and need for rescue medication between the two groups after 8 weeks. There were no serious adverse events reported during the study.
conclusionsThis study suggests that lubiprostone is a safe and effective treatment for increasing weekly SBMs and decreasing CTT in patients with DM and CIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.