Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920978›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

Network interactions underlying mirror feedback in stroke: A dynamic causal modeling study.

Soha Saleh, Mathew Yarossi, Thushini Manuweera, Sergei Adamovich, Eugene Tunik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The instant effect of embodimentFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. EEG Based Analysis of Cortical Activity during Mirror Visual Feedback Target-Directed Movement.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Soha SalehHuman Performance and Engineering Lab, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052, United States.
Mathew YarossiDept. of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, Rutgers University, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07101, United States; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers University, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07101, United States; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, NJIT, 323 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Newark, NJ 07101, United States.
Thushini ManuweeraDept. of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, Rutgers University, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07101, United States; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers University, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07101, United States; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, NJIT, 323 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Newark, NJ 07101, United States.
Sergei AdamovichDept. of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, Rutgers University, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07101, United States; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers University, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07101, United States; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, NJIT, 323 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Newark, NJ 07101, United States.
Eugene TunikDept. of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., 301 RB, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Dept. of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States; Dept. of Biology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USKessler Foundation · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual EnvironmentsR01HD058301 · NICHD · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, MERIANS, ALMA S · 2009 to 2021
$4.7M
Planning and Updating in Frontoparietal Networks for GraspingR01NS085122 · NINDS · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, TUNIK, EUGENE · 2014 to 2025
$3.2M
Brain circuits in motor learningF31NS092268 · NINDS · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI YAROSSI, MATHEW · 2015 to 2017
$77k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058301NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS092268NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mirror visual feedback (MVF) is potentially a powerful tool to facilitate recovery of disordered movement and stimulate activation of under-active brain areas due to stroke. The neural mechanisms underlying MVF have therefore been a focus of recent inquiry. Although it is known that sensorimotor areas can be activated via mirror feedback, the network interactions driving this effect remain unknown. The aim of the current study was to fill this gap by using dynamic causal modeling to test the interactions between regions in the frontal and parietal lobes that may be important for modulating the activation of the ipsilesional motor cortex during mirror visual feedback of unaffected hand movement in stroke patients. Our intent was to distinguish between two theoretical neural mechanisms that might mediate ipsilateral activation in response to mirror-feedback: transfer of information between bilateral motor cortices versus recruitment of regions comprising an action observation network which in turn modulate the motor cortex. In an event-related fMRI design, fourteen chronic stroke subjects performed goal-directed finger flexion movements with their unaffected hand while observing real-time visual feedback of the corresponding (veridical) or opposite (mirror) hand in virtual reality. Among 30 plausible network models that were tested, the winning model revealed significant mirror feedback-based modulation of the ipsilesional motor cortex arising from the contralesional parietal cortex, in a region along the rostral extent of the intraparietal sulcus. No winning model was identified for the veridical feedback condition. We discuss our findings in the context of supporting the latter hypothesis, that mirror feedback-based activation of motor cortex may be attributed to engagement of a contralateral (contralesional) action observation network. These findings may have important implications for identifying putative cortical areas, which may be targeted with non-invasive brain stimulation as a means of potentiating the effects of mirror training.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFeedback, SensoryFemaleFingersFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceStrokeDCMfMRIMirror feedbackMotor controlVirtual realityVisuomotor integration

Identifiers

PMID27920978
PMCPMC5126151
OpenAlexW2556178525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.