ArticleSurgical neurology international2016
Conversion technique from neuroendoscopy to microsurgery in ventricular tumors: Technical note.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsurgical Treatment of Intraventricular Cavernoma with Prior Planning Neuroendoscopy.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentricular tumors represent a major neurosurgical challenge, making endoscopic approach an invaluable tool as it gained importance due to technological advances. Nevertheless, the method is not exempt of risk and limitations, sometimes requiring an open surgery. Thus, initial measurements must be adopted in order to simplify an eventual need for conversion to open craniotomy.
methodsHere, we describe a series of 6 patients with ventricular tumors approached by neuroendoscopy where the conversion to microsurgery turned out to be necessary. Patients' average age was 59.5 years (39-75 years). Average tumoral size was 17.8 mm (15-21 mm). There were 2 cases of lateral ventricle subependymoma and 4 cases of third ventricle colloid cysts. A standard surgical incision was performed in the coronal direction, allowing lateral expansion to 10 cm. Moreover, the endoscopic burr hole was enlarged to a 5 cm craniotomy. A small enlargement of the endoscopic cortical access was performed to gain a transcortical microsurgical corridor to the ventricular cavity. The need for conversion arose due to high consistency of the tumor (3 cases), technical problems (2 cases), and cortical collapse (1 case).
resultsThere was one case of cerebrospinal fluid fistula and infection and one case of transitory memory disturbance. In both the cases, we obtained a complete functional recovery. Clinical and radiological follow-up showed total tumor removal with no recurrences.
conclusionsThe technique herein described was easy to perform, promptly bypassed the endoscopic limitations, and gathered excellent surgical results. The possibility of adapting the method to other tumor locations may be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.