ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016
Advances and Challenges in Viability Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Enabled Imaging for Pathogen Detection Under Stress Conditions: A Systematic Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Pooled it
- Host-selective PMA-PCR enhances bacterial diversity recovery and lowers detection limits in plant microbiome profiling.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of propidium monoazide for 16S ribosomal RNA metabarcoding assessment of microbial communities in 60-day ripened raw goat milk cheese.JDS communications · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Geographical Distribution of FoodborneAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Optimization ofJournal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Accumulation of microbial hazards and assessment of food hygiene associated with broiler chicken processing at open air food markets in Maputo, Mozambique.International journal of food microbiology · 2025Article
- Molecular Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimization of the viability PCR for accurate detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food samples.PloS one · 2025Article
- Novel TaqManFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Novel, Speedy, and Eco-Friendly Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Nitrogen Doped Carbon Dots Biosensors with DFT Calculations, Molecular Docking, and Experimental Validation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Viability discrimination of bacterial microbiomes in home kitchen dish sponges using propidium monoazide treatment.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- Advances in aptamer-based biosensors for monitoring foodborne pathogens.Journal of food science and technology · 2024Review
- Nanotechnology improves the detection of bacteria: Recent advances and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Point-of-Care Diagnostic System for ViableDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimization and Testing of a Commercial Viability PCR Protocol to DetectMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Improving the Efficiency of Viability-qPCR with Lactic Acid Enhancer for the Selective Detection of Live Pathogens in Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Propidium monoazide PCR, a method to determine OsHV-1 undamaged capsids and to estimate virus Lethal Dose 50.Virus research · 2024Review
- Propidium Monoazide Integrated With qPCR Enables Rapid and Universal Detection of Infectious Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viruses.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Phage-Inducible Chromosomal Islands as a Diagnostic Platform to Capture and Detect Bacterial Pathogens.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foodborne outbreaks are a serious public health and food safety concern worldwide. There is a great demand for rapid, sensitive, specific, and accurate methods to detect microbial pathogens in foods. Conventional methods based on cultivation of pathogens have been the gold standard protocols; however, they take up to a week to complete. Molecular assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing, microarray technologies have been widely used in detection of foodborne pathogens. Among molecular assays, PCR technology [conventional and real-time PCR (qPCR)] is most commonly used in the foodborne pathogen detection because of its high sensitivity and specificity. However, a major drawback of PCR is its inability to differentiate the DNA from dead and viable cells, and this is a critical factor for the food industry, regulatory agencies and the consumer. To remedy this shortcoming, researchers have used biological dyes such as ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide (PMA) to pretreat samples before DNA extraction to intercalate the DNA of dead cells in food samples, and then proceed with regular DNA preparation and qPCR. By combining PMA treatment with qPCR (PMA-qPCR), scientists have applied this technology to detect viable cells of various bacterial pathogens in foods. The incorporation of PMA into PCR-based assays for viability detection of pathogens in foods has increased significantly in the last decade. On the other hand, some downsides with this approach have been noted, particularly to achieve complete suppression of signal of DNA from the dead cells present in some particular food matrix. Nowadays, there is a tendency of more and more researchers adapting this approach for viability detection; and a few commercial kits based on PMA are available in the market. As time goes on, more scientists apply this approach to a broader range of pathogen detections, this viability approach (PMA or other chemicals such as platinum compound) may eventually become a common methodology for the rapid, sensitive, and accurate detection of foodborne pathogens. In this review, we summarize the development in the field including progress and challenges and give our perspective in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.