Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920756›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Elena V Gart, Jan S Suchodolski, Thomas H Welsh, Robert C Alaniz, Ronald D Randel, Sara D Lawhon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Supplement with Bromelain,Veterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Interplay betweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Glycyrrhizin AttenuatesFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Multi-functionalized nanocarriers targeting bacterial reservoirs to overcome challenges of multi drug-resistance.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena V GartDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station TX, USA.
Jan S SuchodolskiDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station TX, USA.
Thomas H WelshDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station TX, USA.
Robert C AlanizDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, College of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station TX, USA.
Ronald D RandelTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Overton TX, USA.
Sara D LawhonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station TX, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian digestive tract is home to trillions of microbes, including bacteria, archaea, protozoa, fungi, and viruses. In monogastric mammals the stomach and small intestine harbor diverse bacterial populations but are typically less populated than the colon. The gut bacterial community (microbiota hereafter) varies widely among different host species and individuals within a species. It is influenced by season of the year, age of the host, stress and disease. Ideally, the host and microbiota benefit each other. The host provides nutrients to the microbiota and the microbiota assists the host with digestion and nutrient metabolism. The resident microbiota competes with pathogens for space and nutrients and, through this competition, protects the host in a phenomenon called colonization resistance. The microbiota participates in development of the host immune system, particularly regulation of autoimmunity and mucosal immune response. The microbiota also shapes gut-brain communication and host responses to stress; and, indeed, the microbiota is a newly recognized endocrine organ within mammalian hosts.

Indexed as

autoinducer-2autoinducer-3catecholaminesmicrobiotaquorum sensingSalmonella Typhimuriumstress

Identifiers

PMID27920756
PMCPMC5118420
OpenAlexW2557041764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.