Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

The Temporal Dynamics of Perceiving Other's Painful Actions.

Fang Cui, Ruolei Gu, Xiangru Zhu, Yue-Jia Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fang CuiInstitute of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen China.
Ruolei GuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing China.
Xiangru ZhuInstitute of Cognition and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng China.
Yue-Jia LuoInstitute of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Shenzhen University, ShenzhenChina; Department of Psychology, Southern Medical University, GuangzhouChina; Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, ShenzhenChina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the temporal dynamics of the brain activity predicting the sensory outcomes of observed hand-object interactions of others. Participants are presented with pictures of a hand grasping or withdrawing from noxious and neutral objects. They are then asked to judge whether this hand-object interaction causes painful consequences. In the early stages of stimulus processing, the effect of action was observed in the event-related potential components N1 and N2. Significant interactions of action × object were observed in the later components P3 and late positive potential (LPP): only when the object was noxious, the action "grasp" elicited a significantly larger amplitude than the action "withdrawal". These results suggest that: on the one hand, when observing the hand-object interaction from the third-person perspective, the action type of others can be processed in an automatic style. On the other hand, integrating the information of action and object to predict the sensory consequence of this interaction is a top-down, cognitive controlled processing. The current findings are different from previous studies using first-person perspective visual stimuli which support that the processing of hand-object interaction is rapid and automatic.

Indexed as

action perceptionevent-related potentials (ERPs)painsensory expectation

Identifiers

PMID27920751
PMCPMC5118620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.