Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27920497›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2016

Efficacy and safety of two fixed-dose combinations of S-amlodipine and telmisartan (CKD-828) versus S-amlodipine monotherapy in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled using S-amlodipine monotherapy: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase III clinical study.

Sang-Hyun Ihm, Hui-Kyung Jeon, Tae-Joon Cha, Taek-Jong Hong, Sang-Hyun Kim, Nae-Hee Lee, Jung Han Yoon, Namsik Yoon, Kyung-Kuk Hwang, Sang-Ho Jo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Sang-Hyun IhmDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul.
Hui-Kyung JeonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul.
Tae-Joon ChaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine.
Taek-Jong HongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan.
Sang-Hyun KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul.
Nae-Hee LeeDepartment of Cardiology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon.
Jung Han YoonDivision of Cardiology, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju.
Namsik YoonDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju.
Kyung-Kuk HwangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University, College of Medicine, Cheongju.
Sang-Ho JoDivision of Cardiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea.
Ho-Joong YounDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul.
Catholic University of Korea · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRKosin University · KRNational University College · PRPusan National University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy and safety of CKD-828, a fixed-dose combination of S-amlodipine (the more active isomer of amlodipine besylate, which is calcium channel blocker) and telmisartan (long acting angiotensin receptor blocker), in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled with S-amlodipine monotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible patients (N=187) who failed to respond after 4-week S-amlodipine 2.5 mg monotherapy (sitting diastolic blood pressure [sitDBP] ≥90 mmHg) to receive CKD-828 2.5/40 mg (n=63), CKD-828 2.5/80 mg (n=63), or S-amlodipine 2.5 mg (n=61) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, mean sitDBP change from baseline to Week 8, was compared between the combination (CKD-828 2.5/40 mg and CKD-828 2.5/80 mg) and S-amlodipine monotherapy groups. The safety was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and physical examination findings.

resultsAfter the 8-week treatment, changes in sitDBP/systolic BP (SBP) were -9.67±6.50/-12.89±11.78, -10.72±6.19/-13.79±9.41, and -4.93±7.26/-4.55±11.27 mmHg in the CKD-828 2.5/40 mg (

conclusionCKD-828 is an effective and safe option for patients with inadequate responses to S-amlodipine monotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesCalcium Channel BlockersDrug CombinationsTelmisartantelmisartan amlodipine combinationangiotensin receptor blockerantihypertensiveblood pressurecalcium channel blockerefficacysafety

Identifiers

PMID27920497
PMCPMC5125808
OpenAlexW2555393453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.